so you're gonna vote for the dude whose candidacy was delegitimatized by the charge of quid pro quo that failed to make it into charges in the articles of impeachment against trump lol
Printable View
quid pro joe
you're going to vote for a guy who's actually on trial right now
Yeah, being re-elected doesn't mean his impeachment will be nullified, anyone thinks gets re-election mmay be immune to impeachment but is totally wrong
https://youtu.be/vCSF3reVr10
Joe Biden bragging about withholding aid to Ukraine. And when trump in his perfect phone call asked for an investigation into why the prosecutor was fired, suddenly trump was being accused quid pro quo by an anonymous whistleblower with second hand knowledge of the phone call.
Quid pro quo didn't make it,into the articles of,impeachment because the same,charge can be used against Joe Biden who braggs about witholding aid to,fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son. Instead trump was charge with abuse of power for launching the investigation, which durring the house inquiry a Democrat lawyers testimony admitted he was justified to investigate.
The only other charge in the articles of impeachment is obstruction of Congress. Its not obstruction of Congress to ask the courts to make a ruling. This is simple partisan bullshit.
Trump will fail to be removed and the democrats already admitted they will immediately start a second attempt at impeachment. Complete horse shit no-one should happy they are wasting Americans time and money for hyper partisan politics just so they can retain whatever corrupt pay to play schemes they have with drug mules and foreign states or whatever
It's been done by both parties and it's not going to stop after trump.
I celebrated s little this week when I heard a Texan judge blocked trumps use of military funds to build the wall :bobsley:
here's some Lonnie approved news media coverage
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fed...l-construction
Great job changing the subject from biden's corruption and you're willingness to vote for him
i've seen this several times, he was putting pressure on ukraine, in the open, to do something that was policy. if you think that's anywhere near trump talking trying to have an investigation opened into biden's son to cause scandal before an election you're being completely disingenuous.
I think i ran across some vintage 70's porn videos on some dirty site last night that feature lily but i'm not sure if it's her or not because it's so grainy
i pierced my ears last night. i'm a sexy ready bitch for you.
here you go, loonie, what you're trying to posit, without proof, simply isn't true
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...or/3785620002/
sorry it's not from nnnnnnnnn, taking something out if context
Imagining idiom
a statement by Ukrainian MP Andriy Derkach describing evidence of corruption from former Ukraine ecology minister and owner of the Burisma Group, Mykola Zlochevsky. Burisma who was paying $50,000/month to Hunter Biden despite him not having any former experience in natural gas or the energy sector, this corruption was being investigated by the former prosecutor contrary to your articles claims he was fired for not investigating any form of corruption. This is because your article isn't factually correct, its social media astroturfed opinion written to protect the current front running democrat candidate and the whistle blower hearsay narrative that lead to the trump impeachment inquiry.Quote:
Originally Posted by https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/625876.html
further evidence that joe biden abuses his position of power in order to financially benefit his son hunter's business dealings, this time with US tax dollars in tax havens instead of ukrainian tax dollars. did you rep me "no" and then post an easily refuted article or was that someone else, if it was you maybe this same short shortsightedness is the reason you would vote for an objectively corrupt politician lolQuote:
Originally Posted by https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/hunter-biden-linked-company-received-130m-in-special-federal-loans-while-joe-biden-was-vp
yet that nnn video you posted and neither of your other posts to me prove any of what you claim. They, in fact, use words like suspicion when talking about biden and son and clearly state this policy of quid had the endgame being regime change to a democrscy friendly govt in Ukraine as the pro, begining under a republican administration.
I changed the subject because I thought we were done with one topic, but I guess this is a much more serious, intense discussion with certain posting rules of order. Sorry, loonie
I didn't rep you. I almost always rep with, "greens -rootbeer" or don't write anything at all. I should actually give you rep for what I told you via pms, thx
i didn't know what NNN is until just now, i thought you were making some pun about how i'm apart of the fox news audience (just to be clear i've stated many times i'm not). I just searched for the most concise video featuring the biden quote. Also i don't know what posting rules of order are.
Of course neither of us have "proof", we're debating whether or not there is evidence enough to justify investigation into abruptly ended investigations and an impeachment inquiry into whether or not trump was abusing his power when suggesting Ukraine should be investigating the son of his political rival. The fact that Joe Biden is a candidate does not exonerating him from criminal allegations, in fact his candidacy legitimizes the urgency of the investigation because of his potential to be in a seat of power.
The articles i've used display enough evidence to justify further investigation and as i just stated the fact that biden is trumps rival is superseded by the evidence of biden's corruption. Therefore not only does this (not a charge btw) biden's candidacy it also undermines the abuse of power charge in the trump articles of impeachment as well as the entire narrative which led up to the impeachment inquiry.
no one has posted evidence of "trump's corruption" that i haven't been able to deconstruct. For the most part everyone here has complained about his policy but haven't provided a substantial corruption narrative as made evident by the fact that the 3 years of democrats planning impeachment has resulted in a poorly constructed nothing burger. I could go on to refute claims in an attempt to save both of us time but that would be selling past the close.