+rep
Results 31 to 57 of 57
-
-
09-28-2014
Thanks
With a 'push' approach to gravity, we could expect the possibility of there being a region of the universe beyond ours consisting of a thick evenly dispersed medium of matter (possibly dark matter, although it could simply be ordinary matter) which forms a shell/cloud around our region of the universe. This outer shell-layer of the universe reflects energy back in toward the inner region of the universe, causing the matter within the inner region to endlessly richochet within that inner region.
That's just an educated guess, but it doesn't seem to leave anything out.Last edited by Plug Drugs; 09-28-2014 at 06:12 PM.
-
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Posts
- 13,345
09-28-2014Shove some pills within your inner region
-
09-30-2014
i guess u could say... ure pushing on a string
theory
-
Lisaking steveyos09-30-2014
Intelligent falling.
Look it up, it's taking the piss out of intelligent design but seeing as you struggle with the concept of gravity so much you might like to just cop out and go with that.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_falling
-
-
09-30-2014
Wait a minute, you can explain gravity?
How about you? *looks at you*
That's cool, didn't know you were all amateur physicists too
-
-
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Posts
- 13,345
09-30-2014Stop encouraging her to post wtf is wrong with you
-
Lisaking steveyos09-30-2014
FFS plug drugs, I spent pages explaining gravity to you just a couple of weeks ago when you went posting in that science forum. Go back and re-read that. Honestly it's a theory most people have been able to grasp for centuries. It gets tedious doing this every time especially if I would just be repeating what we discussed weeks ago. Try actually listening to the scientists instead of making up your own rubbish.
I'm sick of this. It offends me, when it comes to posting about science plug drugs get it right or don't post it at all. Otherwise if you insist on making up rubbish then go post with creationists.
-
-
-
09-30-2014
you need to understand the change in the models for gravity throughout history. Starting with Newton (although I don't necessarily think he is the first one to think or mention it; maybe 'English' history is just going to credit 'English' scientists, but he was a badass either way); then when you have to account for the speed of light, you need to understand that this entailed more than just 'that', there is a re-conceptualization of space involved as well -- Einstein had to float around getting help from mathematics professors and colleagues for years to get the tensors together
Then you need to understand what it actually means when applying it to the real world or other branches of physics; for example, if light bends around massive objects, but gravity is a force, then how can a 'force' be affecting the trajectory of another force? If you decide that gravity isn't a 'force', but instead just geodesics of space-time curvature, then why is it treated mathematically as a force? That last one is still a question being asked by physicists today, by the way - although they usually realize that the equation is just an equation, and when they need to they are able to account for the inconsistencies using common sense.
-
09-30-2014
Do you have that common sense Lisa? You do, but you don't ever try putting it into words or math; try it
-
09-30-2014
That little thing you've noticed that people on the internet are talking about gravity, it could very well be more than just what it's easiest for you to view it as; it could be the human species finally being able to answer these questions by having a medium for openly exchanging ideas. Each brain of every person doing that on the internet is having to work together to put it together; maybe that's what it takes for us to literally 'process' such ideas.
-
-
Lisaking steveyos
-
10-01-2014
plug drugs creed youtubes and push gravity bullshit,,
I am the owner of http://www.ezmangaforum.com
-
10-01-2014
string theory obviously correct, it has the right number of dimensions, it unifies quantum mechanics and general relativity, even stephen hawking knows this and he's crippled and in a wheelchair and blows his words through a tube, drug-addled posting wins again
-
-
-
Lisaking steveyos10-03-2014
Yeah uh push gravity has been conclusively proven to be incorrect. Only a couple of weeks before this plug drugs had myself and a whole forum of actual scientists explain gravity to him and he is still failing to grasp it. He muddles in old disproven theories with other unrelated other theories and comes up with something that combines some big words but makes no actual sense at all
http://www.thescienceforum.com/physi...-not-work.html
Further he tried this in a forum with actual scientists and still tries to claim that everyone else just uses a Wikipedia article to formulate ideas, he was talking to actual scientists with actual degrees and jobs in the field. Where does he think he is getting his nonsense from? He doesn't have any verified learning on any of this and he doesn't even know how to study a subject, any subject in a valid way.
See the thing is, none of that post about gravity is actually correct at all and it doesn't make any sense.
-
-
10-03-2014
push gravity confirmed for real
-
10-03-2014
i guess nobody noticed that lisa's rep went from red to green in this thread maybe you guys should read it again from the beginning
-
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)