sent him a sexy pm from cag's account trying to get him to cyber with me and he knew it was me,and did not even have cyber sex with me, even after he found out it was me
sent him a sexy pm from cag's account trying to get him to cyber with me and he knew it was me,and did not even have cyber sex with me, even after he found out it was me
sent me a fucking odie picture from garfiled and odie, wtf, super gay
now i'm pinning all my hopes and dreams on cameron doing cybersex with cag's account
he registered on the forum
Quote:
Originally Posted by captainflibby
he gets laid guys, girls let him touch their boobies and vaginas and whatnot :hide:
girl from reddit, what is sex like? I really want to know
hmm tips my fedro to you good sir
desolation please validate this chick's account so she can post in my thread
do something good with yoru admin powers for once
teach me how to touch a boob and also how to add extra words into badly written sentences in a vain attempt to very much rectify the vast majority of looking smarter than I actually am
i wholeheartedly disagree with this.
The vast majority of games that do this objectifying fall into 3 categories:
1) older games: These titles and marketing documents were (mostly) developed while the gaming market was still very much maturing, and like most processes of maturation, the games industry did do wrong, this is an example of such, and the industry has (mostly) rectified this, to the point where titles like Duke Nukem Forever is singled out and actively criticised for it's old-school misogynism. These titles do not represent the market today.
2) Crime simulators or games that take place in a seedy criminal underworld. The objectification here is done as part of setting the atmosphere of seediness and corruption. That's not misogynism, that's just making a believable setting. Do you really think a criminal underworld is going to care about political correctness?
3) Games set in historical eras. This is usually because that's how women WERE treated at that time period. IUt's not misogynism to represent something based on (largely) historical fact.
EDIT: WHY THE DOWNVOTES?????
where is ob's post history i need to be able to become friends with the reddit person you got to come here,, just gonna copy and paste her left wing aitheist transexual bullshit, where he never posted his sweet sweet tranny dick not evne once, :mad: I ASKED NICELY LIKE 60,000 TIMES
i can't even read that it's so boring
ob is undoubtedly on reddit
Extremist viewpoints are not echoed by authority of the subject, but by how loud they scream bloody murder when any way but their way is followed. Those " tweets and messages sent by anonymous people on the internet" are a clear-cut example of this in that they made the general news. Extremists of any circle are not known for rational thinking that can be followed logically by an outsider.
When miss Nevada said 'you need to learn to defend yourself' and solve the problem on your own personal level, a bunch of people went 'no, we need to change society to revolve around our needs'. A rational feminist would recognise that the latter approach just doesn't work. This is true for all members and groups within society, you cannot change it to suit your needs, no matter how well-meaning the intent
Sounds like you've been friendzoned. While it aint as bad as many people make out, it's amazingly hard to come out of. Honestly, you're better off looking elsewhere. For your social gathering, just be cool about it.
Chances are she'll introduce you to a girl who might be a better fit for you anyways, and since your friend will probably wax lyrical about you, this will make your life so much easier
Universities have these groups called societies dedicated to hobbies and beliefs (think of them like offline subreddits)
I think the fundamental problem here is that you went to the law subreddit for validation on your patient abandonment claim. When they told you this did not apply and why it didnt apply, you persisted they (the doctor) had a duty because you've been seeing them for years, but this is not what is in the law, and the law is what you were discussing.
For a counter-argument in a facts-based discussion (like law and legislation) to work, it needs to add new information that is relevant to the topic. In this case, that would be legislature and case law or additional info that pertains to such, not opinions or customer loyalty issues. It may have been better to have posted it in a more general 'what do i do' thread. All they pointed out was that in the eyes of the law, you don't have a case
here's the thing though, Sonic is a bright blue hedgehog that has been famous since the early 90s
banna for size
http://i.imgur.com/HbBx0.jpg
btw found this on reddit
What is this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by maks
from bluefactories sent 14 hours ago
welp, that was briefly entertaining/interesting until I realised it was just copypasta of an old forum buddy of yours. Benny? Barry? Who cares- you can keep sending it if you like, I'm not particularly fussed. Shine on, you crazy diamond.