Community Forum Software by IP.Board 3.4.6
more like unpatched full of holes free fourm software,,, who want's to be mods in sciene fourm ful of fags
Community Forum Software by IP.Board 3.4.6
more like unpatched full of holes free fourm software,,, who want's to be mods in sciene fourm ful of fags
BAN ME, FROM SCIENCE I DON'T FUCKING THINK SO,, I AM SCIENE BITCH
As for gravity the current idea is that an object of mass bends the space time and it is the space time that acts on the object to cause it to fall towards the other object. The idea is like if you hold out a sheet flat and put a marble on it the marble would cause the sheet to sink in the middle and other marbles you drop onto the sheet are going to fall towards the original marble because the fabric has been bent
COMPUTER SCIENICE QUESTION HOW DO YOU PATCH FREE SHITTY FOURM SOFTWARE FROM SIMPLE SQL INJECJOTION THAT IS WELL KNOWN AND A HUGE FUCKING EXPLOIT YOU STUPID FAGS???
i can make shit up too lisa,, watch this,,
what if the world we live in is acutally in some crazy ausltiran womens vagina and outside of the vagina there is a much larger world and that's why the sky is blue because the crazy ausltiran women is acutally in her blow up bathtub
You're going to need mathematical evidence for that before you present it to the nerds doing the maths on quantum mechanics
Vag = b2 - (brown ground + blue blow up bath)
Therefore Vag = your whole existence
Trumped
http://www.scienceforums.com/ is better, lol dot net, pls like any real science goes on there
If this thread isnt reason enough to herp plug drugs i don't know what is. Fuck this faggot
Stop trying to join in steveyos cag jihad josh, you're a waste of space
A waste of space time continuum
Continuum continium. Never runs out. Has no ending.
pete when lisa does sex what kind of nosies does she make
I have no idea. Im asexual.
give me the deets i need to know for a robot i am builing
Not absolute. But maybe crunches numbers. Lol.
There's relativistic mass which must tie in to energy (you know, e=mc^2) then there is mass in its classical sense: resistance to being accelerated by a force.
The concept of the former is reached by considering that there is no objective reference frame, and whether a particle is accelerating or not depends on its relation to other particles. Hence, the more a particle accelerates, the more it will interact with what's around it, leading to an observed increase in volume as well as time for the particle.
and yeah, if you're putting the pieces together and noticing, that 'volume and time' is spacetime, and acceleration warps it
i love how you have to post about your totally wrong push gravity theroy here because your shitty thread was locked because you have no idea what you are talking about and are just making shit up as you go along you fat nigger fag
The FLRW solutions to the Einstein Field Equations (the one they were asking me to disprove in that thread) assumes homogenous mass and not individual particles with the electromagnetic property of 'charge'.
Obviously, I was trying to promote and advocate the latter.
your so fat that food takes the path of least resteince to your fat mouth,, boom nigger,, you just got sinciencedd
you push carts at walmart, that's why you came up with the push gravity theory from the 1600's, because you a fat retard who pushes carts
call bill nye the siceuicen guy it's time to debate pluyg drugs he just proved a bunch of acutal scienetief models totally wrong,by regugurating a totally wrong theroy rom the middel ages, just like newton and his apple tree,, tey will talk about plug drugs and his walmart carts
Le Sage's theory of gravitation is a kinetic theory of gravity originally proposed by Nicolas Fatio de Duillier in 1690 and later by Georges-Louis Le Sage in 1748. The theory proposed a mechanical explanation for Newton's gravitational force in terms of streams of tiny unseen particles (which Le Sage called ultra-mundane corpuscles) impacting all material objects from all directions. According to this model, any two material bodies partially shield each other from the impinging corpuscles, resulting in a net imbalance in the pressure exerted by the impact of corpuscles on the bodies, tending to drive the bodies together. This mechanical explanation for gravity never gained widespread acceptance, although it continued to be studied occasionally by physicists until the beginning of the 20th century, by which time it was generally considered to be conclusively discredited.
le fat retard
was proven totally fucking wrong you stupid kike shut up pls god dammit go back to acutal school
i bet none of the people who tried to prove it out ever shoved drugs up there asshole
Until you can explain the GR EFE to me, or even show me you know anything about gravity at all, you're just regurgitating mainstream opinions.
Fuckin dickweed.
earth is flat, lots of fucking retards still try to prove that, so take your middle age hocus pocus somewhere else retard ,, rubynet is a place for newtown and his thoery of gravation
take some math classes down at the adult learning annex you fukcing tard