Obama is immature and annoying fake gentleman who would to support corrupted dictators
Printable View
Obama is immature and annoying fake gentleman who would to support corrupted dictators
Also, as you know, most of the jobs I work in are public safety/goverment, and Mitt Romney has gone on record saying we don't need more firefighters, EMTs, etc.
That's my career, man.
I just want to piss off christians and people on forums dude i don't give a fuck about politics
He might. He probably will. But he's going to have 2016 hanging over his head, so he might reel it back a little bit. If Obama was this bloodthirsty in his first term I can't even imagine what he's going to do in his second, with no more elections to worry about.
Also, give him the benefit of the doubt. The guy who's murdered no one sure as hell deserves our support more than the guy who has killed thousands. By voting for Obama you're endorsing his behavior, you're telling him, and the rest of Washington, that the American public appreciates him slaughtering folks en masse.
There would be if the government didn't have a monopoly on those services. Would you be better off if you could shop your skills around, play employers off of each other and make them compete for your talents?
also http://parkprivatization.com/
these people he's "murdered" aren't exactly eagle scouts and choir boys. sure some innocents are going to be caught in the mix but it's a fucking war out there. there's too much red tape to grant everyone due process and too little time to play with when it comes to preventing another 9/11
uh huh that's a fine excuse for violating the christ out of the 4th amendment and murdering american citizens by remote control, and I'm sure everyone will understand when he starts doing it on American soil because fuck it if someone was targeted they must be a terrorist right?
i think obama's taking things the right direction but still not doing enough. we need glass-steagall back already. and i'm pissed off that bailout money paid for bonuses to those who drove the economy to shit, but it's not worth taking a chance on an unapologetic plutocrat that he might not do the same thing. the 47% shit tells me all i need to know as far as where his allegiances lie
intel has failed before and will fail again, collateral damage is almost a certainty. but i have a much higher chance of being blown up by a terrorist than i do by the CIA, especially if we wait too long to act on intel reports. we would have gotten bin laden years ago if we hadn't kept respecting pakistan's pitiful sovereignity
i'm going to write in "dickcheese" on my ballot
Collateral damage? He intentionally targeted an American citizen and his 16 year old son for assassination via drone strike.
Agreed, but we're talking about the president right now. "They do it too!" is not an excuse for violating the 4th amendment.
when did obama kill thousands
usa drones its own people?
Not yet
if im hanging out overseas and sympathizing with terrorists should we really put agents' lives at risk to come out there, capture me, and send me back to america for a hearing just because i'm a citizen? should DoD stand by and let me continue to damage national security until that happens?
because of the information i handled at my last job, i would expect to be taken out if i was doing what this guy was doing in yemen. granted, i don't find the threat of death to be a crime deterrant, but i do love my country. if romney promises not to do such a thing then he is throwing our security under the bus, which I personally think should be criminal
what country hasnt killed a couple civies anyway
Sure we're supposed to be better than that, we're america for crying out loud. But there's been riots, hostage situations, bungled investigations, and all kinds of scenarios where it turned out that the best decision at the time was to shoot first. sometimes it stands as the best decision, sometimes it doesn't.
Bull fucking shit they don't
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politic...death-10470891
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/201...tacks-lawsuit/
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/wo....html?_r=2&hp&
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...ssL_story.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/19/wo...emen.html?_r=0
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1883951.html
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-...es-134889.html
we can't afford this terrorist due process without putting american lives at risk
we can't afford this gang member due process without putting american lives at risk
we can't afford this drug dealer due process without putting american lives at risk
we can't afford this political protester due process without putting american lives at risk