yes that's why they've been sued so many times :stare:Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonman
regardless of the legality how the fuck can you come in here calling them trilblazers when they stole almost every single one of their hits? we're not talking about a riff here and there either, the entire lemon song was stolen, so was dazed and confused, and so was stairway to heaven.
gotta love the classics =P
I dont know i dont know the ehole story i didnt launch a petsonal investogation to figure out which songs were stolen and to what extent. I know they did flat out just play otger people's songs without mebtioning the original musicians, you actually showed me that first.. i know that kashmir is original, and i think over the hills and far away and whole lotta love arevtoo just to show their creative ability in their own right. And its like in the 80s everyone suddenly discovered the ability to sue each other. Led zeppelin probably wasnt the one tgat chose to have them listed as the sole writing credits, it was probably the record company
And they stole (ill just say stole to not argue the point) like less than 10 songs, a lot of musicians play other peopls songs. Just because the original songwriters werent mentioned on the album cover doesnt suddenly make led zeppelin villains of the music world
oh who cares if zeppelin copied, nothing is really original anyhow not even you and your super special interests. not their fault the other band couldn't make it with the exact same music. sucks to be them. still better than lord kanye west and his deep lyrics about pushing a rav4 and the benz he gonna roll up in yo i thought this thread was going to be about clothes but i am disappointed now and sad
you're missing the point. they're not innovators if they stole everything. if you believe they're one of the most innovative bands in rock history it's a pretty good indication that you don't know squat about music and should shut your mouth. stick to talking about drugs, you're pretty good at being a worthless junkie.
They didnt steal everything they stole some things
even if they stole their impact on music cannot be denied who cares who cares who cares lets talk about shopping
beatles stole too, everyone stole who cares who cares who cares this isnt worth the gray hairs and flaring american tempers
Its not like other bands dont just all play pretty much the same things as each other, music is kind of hard to claim ownership of, theres only 12 notes and a handful of scales.. Should bo diddley sue whoever the hell sings that "i love candy" song for stealing his rhythm?
they tole every single hit they had, people only knew of them from the things they plagiarized, for all intents and circumstances they might as well have stolen everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonman
everything you're saying right now is plagiarized too maks they arent oringal ideas we may as well just be reading an article on this because your opinion is stolen its not fresh and innovative this is such a boring convo