lisa demanded that ruby delete that thread with photos of her dead ex boyfriends new girlfriend and ruby did it, please write your senator
Printable View
lisa demanded that ruby delete that thread with photos of her dead ex boyfriends new girlfriend and ruby did it, please write your senator
rubys a pussy update installed
All of us demanded lisa be banned but it never happened
Lisa we don’t want to go down that road
someone pm me the pictures and I'll set up a script to spam them
Get lives
stop posting here
Stop harassing Bev and I will, you post that shit and I’m staying, ball is in your court
Why do you even fucking care freak, it’s pathetic
No. I'm not negotiating, I'm not making a deal, I'm telling you how it is. If you choose to post here I will do anything and everything to make it an unpleasant experience for you. You don't like that? Leave.
That's 100% of the options I'm giving you, there's no wiggle room here, I'm not going to listen to any counter offers. We're not haggling. Just fucking go.
You losers have continued to harass Bev even when I wasn’t posting for months, get lives and stop your pathetic shit or I’m staying and having shit deleted and bgd banned. Simple as that. Get a life already
I haven't done shit to bev but I'm about to start, and I'm going to make sure she knows that you could have stopped it and you refused.
And you can shut the fuck up about it, you’re the one continuing with this
Things are about to get real up in dis bitch
Welp looks like I’m staying
Logging out, so easy a dead donny could do it
GET
A
LIFE
donny hasn't posted even once since october, if a junkie can handle it so can you
:whassup:
sad
what other hapless admin is going to give into Lisa's vile demands
idk why lisa likes causing pain for her "best friend" bev. it's pretty sick, fucking sadist
Bev is cool
You’re not
turns out libel does not work for dead people and the administration of rubynet are giving into an insane womans demands because they hate free speech
No. Spoken defamation about a person is slander; written defamation would be libel. In either case, the defamation is a tort against a living person, with the remedy pursued by the allegedly harmed person in civil court. If a person is dead, courts have held that he or she has no reputation to harm -- and no ability to sue you for damage.
Despite another answer's reference to the Texas statute, this review of the topic suggests that only Rhode Island's statute stands, and only applies to obituaries printed within three months of the death.
Other aspects of defamation still apply; truth is an absolute defense to claims of defamation, (the disputing of which may allow the defense to disclose details about the supposedly defamed person in court). And there is a greater leeway for commentary about public figures.
Look at dp spazz
I wonder how.many.times Mark's is going to post that picture
He wouldn’t dare!