Intellectual property of alias/pen name "Plug Drugs" at rubycalaber.com, also posted on scienceforums.net
Please contact me online for permission if you wish to duplicate elsewhere.
1. Since the waves of all fundamental forces are sinusoidal, then acceleration of a particle by a fundamental force can only produce sinusoidal curvature in the particle's trajectory.
2. Since the direction a particle is traveling in can only change from being accelerated by a force, and forces only curve a particle's path sinusoidally, then particles' trajectories can only ever curve, without there ever being sharp angles; when there seems to be a sharp angle in trajectory, viewed at a small enough scale there would only be sinusoidal curvature.
3. Since trajectories of particles only consist of sinusoidal curves, and a particle is affected by forces from every direction constantly with their intensity diminishing over distance as a ratio of a sphere's radius to its surface area, the distribution of the intensity of surrounding waves of force in a section of spacetime would also fall off as a sinusoidal curve. Thus, the path of any particle when plotted out would be coiling in shape.
4. Due to the intrinsic geometry of a coil, the clockwise or counterclockwise orientation of a coil is unchanging, and is preserved no matter how the coil is flipped or rotated. As long as the coil only consists of curves, the clockwise/counterclockwise orientation stays the same, and can only change from sharp angles in the coil - at which point it technically ceases to be a coil.
5. Since waves of force are produced by a particle whenever it is accelerated, and since a coiling trajectory is constant acceleration, waves of force constantly propagate out from a particle as the trajectory of the particle curves.
6. The waves of force produced from the coiling trajectory of a particle would also maintain a coiling shape while propagating out from the particle, with the clockwise/counterclockwise orientation of the coiling preserved as well.
7. Particles affected by waves of force with opposite clockwise/counterclockwise orientations in the coiling of their trajectories, would, for geometrical reasons, be highly inclined to be 'stalled' in the oppositely-coiling waves of force produced by the other particle, the latter particle would also be inclined to become 'stalled' in the force waves coming from the former particle. The resulting effect would be predicted to appear similar to attractive 'pairing' between opposite charges.
Is any part of all that definitely not correct or most probably wrong?
If you have graphing software, you could put the 'sinusoidal coiling' preserving its clockwise/counterclockwise orientation to the test: try to curve the trajectory of a point particle with only sinusoidal curves, and the forces accelerating can't cheat the inverse square law. I think you'll find that the more you try to implement sharp curves, the more you will displace the particle, and that to have higher intensity waves of force requires more mass/energy considered over a larger volume, which will be lost to entropy of the system, or would affect all nearby particles to a similar extent, and the particle would still have a coiling trajectory relative to those particles. You'd probably need to consider extreme scenarios like supernovae, quasars, particle colliders, or black holes.
If you tried using powerful equipment to knock a particle back and forth between alternating electromagnets to get a non-sinusoidal curve in the particle's trajectory, you could still only decrease the diameter of the coil to smaller and smaller scales so its hard to observe, or drown it out with other signals, but the frequency of the coiling would still be present no matter how tiny. Coiling trajectory is also true at the largest of scales; celestial bodies orbiting each other are moving through space in pseudo-unison while in orbit with each other, making their trajectory through space-time coiled.
Another possible way to view the concept geometrically I was thinking of (it could be false though, I don't know); consider the distance between two particles with the distance between them growing/shrinking due to forces affecting the particles trajectory - the change in distance graphed on an XY coordinate grid would be indistinguishable from two points moving along the circumferences of two separate ellipses, with the dimensions of the ellipses changing randomly to match their real movements in spacetime, and graphing the change instead as the changing curvature proportional to the rate they're traveling the circumference. The graphed increase/decrease in both cases would also consist of sinusoidal curves. Relative to each other, the two particles could be thought of as coiling orthogonal to the plane of the two ellipses
Results 1 to 30 of 78
-
05-09-2016
Last edited by Plug Drugs; 05-09-2016 at 02:19 AM.
-
-
-
05-09-2016
im not reading it but im assuming its a job application. good work! me and im sure the rest of the forum is proud of you for taking our advice.
-
05-09-2016
are you guys bots
-
05-09-2016
D-
**This account has been officially hacked and the original user is not liable for any future posts**
-
-
05-09-2016
http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/9...ticles-charge/
The other nerds basically called him a retard and said his rant is bullshit, also he has negative rep
-
05-09-2016
Originally Posted by some nerd
-
-
05-09-2016
clay makes a pretty compelling argument, got a rebuttal michael?
-
-
-
05-09-2016
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision." - Bertrand Russell
-
05-09-2016
and anyways he missed the point; the thread was about coiling trajectories
I think he stopped reading after the 2nd or 3rd paragraph
-
05-09-2016
here's a whole thread of nerds shitting on your dumb longwinded theory http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/9...y/#entry908134
-
05-09-2016
Hey, that's how I feel.
What's more painful about our time is that creativity and imagination by itself doesn't get you anything, even when you come up with something amazing, it is either going to be stolen or ignored if you're not in the right position in society to profit or get credit for it.
-
05-09-2016
everyone in that thread has over 400 rep, some have over 3000, but you, well you have -6, which just goes to show that even the nerds on the nerd forum hate you and you're not nearly as smart as you think you are, mr dunning kreuger
-
-
-
05-09-2016
why don't you read and make an attempt to understand what bertrand is saying instead of trying to twist it to your own ends, because he's talking about you, and he does not paint you in a flattering light
-
-
-
05-09-2016
that probably means something
-
05-09-2016
actually society is a big joke right now. No one has a 'real' job; and for the ones that do have those 'real' jobs out there in the world, all you ever hear about is how those people suck at their job
what do you mean about my potential anyways? I've taught myself calculus; I've made amazing works of art; I've been learning how to play masterpieces on the piano and guitar. I am constantly thinking, and trying to learn.
I just haven't done it the conventional way because I'm not going to put myself in debt like an idiot.
-
05-09-2016
Yeah I kind of go out of my way to consider all alternatives from the ground up, so I've hit them with a lot of very difficult questions in very difficult topics, in the form of writing out hypotheses of my own and seeking their opinions on it (which has been invaluable to me, actually).
Sometimes it gets a little heated though, probably 3 of the neg reps are from that, and the other 3 are probably people scoffing at someone trying to form their own thoughts about something
-
05-09-2016
you're in your mid 20's and the entirety of your resume is pushing carts at walmart. being chronically unemployable is not how one stays out of debt. "durr I'm too smart for student loans" is just yet another excuse you have to blame for your failure to achieve anything worthwhile. hobbies don't count as achievements, stop being stupid. oh wow, you can play godsmack on your pawn shop stratocaster and you know everything about division and multiplication that wikipedia could teach you, that's great, what's next you going to tell me about your pokemon card collection.
-
-
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)