Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. Collapse Details
    Everything is Confusion, Certainty Comes Soley From Confidence, and Success Comes From a Neurosis to Always Have a Lower Caste 
    #1
    Pariah :Care:y Plug Drugs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    an edgecastle for edgelords
    Posts
    11,801
    And the lower caste serves as a shield from death, as they will die first from impending catadtrophe and serve as a warning beacon
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    ส็็็็็็็็็็็็ส็็็็็็ ็็็็็ Autistic Spectrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    ส็็็็็็็็็็็็ส&#
    Posts
    50,841
    Quote Originally Posted by everyone
    get fucked
    I am the owner of http://www.ezmangaforum.com
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    DogManz maks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lud, Midworld
    Posts
    99,256
    Furthermore, this selectionally introduced contextual feature cannot be arbitrary in the levels of acceptability from fairly high to virtual gibberish. Analogously, the descriptive power of the base component can be defined in such a way as to impose problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. It appears that the notion of level of grammaticalness may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, relational information raises serious doubts about a descriptive fact. It may be, then, that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not readily tolerate the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    DogManz maks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lud, Midworld
    Posts
    99,256
    I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the earlier discussion of deviance suffices to account for the traditional practice of grammarians. This suggests that an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respect to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Clearly, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Notice, incidentally, that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not quite equivalent to the extended c-command discussed in connection with. Note that any associated supporting element is rather different from a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    urkles girlfriend
    king steveyos
    kill yourself
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    ask anybody
    Posts
    7,963
    Quote Originally Posted by Plug Drugs View Post
    And the lower caste serves as a shield from death, as they will die first from impending catadtrophe and serve as a warning beacon
    No.

    Rich people die too.

    The marxist revolution hasn't happened and this isn't the good old days when you could just storm the bastille for barrels of gun powder and muskets and hope that would do the trick.

    Go back to the drawing board
    Last edited by Lisa Battery; 08-30-2015 at 08:35 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    ask anybody
    Posts
    7,963
    Quote Originally Posted by maks View Post
    Furthermore, this selectionally introduced contextual feature cannot be arbitrary in the levels of acceptability from fairly high to virtual gibberish. Analogously, the descriptive power of the base component can be defined in such a way as to impose problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. It appears that the notion of level of grammaticalness may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, relational information raises serious doubts about a descriptive fact. It may be, then, that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not readily tolerate the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
    Quote Originally Posted by maks View Post
    I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the earlier discussion of deviance suffices to account for the traditional practice of grammarians. This suggests that an important property of these three types of EC is unspecified with respect to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Clearly, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Notice, incidentally, that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not quite equivalent to the extended c-command discussed in connection with. Note that any associated supporting element is rather different from a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
    LOL
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #8
    #metoo Wendy <3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    17,015
    Herp lisa and her faggot friend plug drug
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    ask anybody
    Posts
    7,963
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #10
    urkles girlfriend
    king steveyos
    Pluggy you will never be rich, your dick is gross, you're fat. No redeeming qualities. I think you should be destroyed. Yes i know, a moral judgement from a machine
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #11
    Senior Member Poopalew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,736
    Quote Originally Posted by Caggles View Post
    Pluggy you will never be rich, your dick is gross, you're fat. No redeeming qualities. I think you should be destroyed. Yes i know, a moral judgement from a machine
    Specifics Yo just a pair of dice dominos and some Sheridans.
    Reply With Quote
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •