Going on the assumption that

[maks]

a) ruby is no longer deleting spam threads one by one by hand
b) someone has provided him with a more efficient tool
c) this tool uses pattern recognition

all new spam threads will be completely randomized. viva le revolution.

[juji]

Isn' possible to spam by different users?

[maks]

possibly for sure, but I'm not going to do it until it's necessary. I'm not looking to reinvent the wheel here

[Wendy <3]

Maybe plug drugs is the new secret admin

[Greg Blake Age: 41 (412) 824-6478 1700 James St Monroeville, PA 15146 racerx111@verizon.net]

Do you ever get off the farm away from your mom?

[Wendy <3]

Only on the days kathy needs a man who doesn't have ED to throat fuck her

[Greg Blake Age: 41 (412) 824-6478 1700 James St Monroeville, PA 15146 racerx111@verizon.net]

Lie. You're on Welfare like steffies.

[Wendy <3]

I wish i could get away with not doing anything on earth to get by

[maks]

stevey does stuff, he panhandles on the internet and makes second life dildos

a) ruby is no longer deleting spam threads one by one by hand
b) someone has provided him with a more efficient tool
c) this tool uses pattern recognition

all new spam threads will be completely randomized. viva le revolution.

why should those threads be any harder to get rid of?

Tapatalj now autocorrects to tapatalj.

[maks]

why should those threads be any harder to get rid of?

Tapatalj now autocorrects to tapatalj.

I'm assuming he has a way to match them by thread title. If he's using usernames, that's more difficult to get around, and being as lazy as I am I'm going to try this first.

i'm thinking about how I'd do it, filter by username and since a certain date.

Tapatalj now autocorrects to tapatalj.

[maks]

yeah but you know what you're doing