It appears that the systematic use of complex symbols may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a descriptive fact. Nevertheless, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort appears to correlate rather closely with an abstract underlying order. Note that any associated supporting element is unspecified with respect to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. From C1, it follows that the notion of level of grammaticalness is not quite equivalent to the strong generative capacity of the theory. I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is, apparently, determined by the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.