in some states they have no-fault insurance. this then makes each person pay for their own problems. this is even closer to the health insurance model.
my main point is about being mandated to pay for something. why are you for one mandate, when you're against the other? if you hit someone why not leave it up to the courts to have you claim damages from the other person if you believe they're at fault?
Results 1 to 30 of 115
Threaded View
-
my weapons turn me into a
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- every once in a while
- Posts
- 29,860
08-07-2012Last edited by m0nde; 08-07-2012 at 03:07 PM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts