Re: Sock Monkey
by jack » 20 Nov 2000, 21:58

The lawyer in your head is no doubt very interested. As an expert on the internet law you so broadly interperet however, I'm afraid you don't have a "pot to piss in" as they say.

But that's the beauty of America, ain't it, Crayonaut? You can threaten and bluster, but at 125-475 per plus expenses, I think you'll be doing just that.

Threaten and bluster I mean.

Now, let's deal with this pornography issue you accuse TM of with his Sock Monkey Comic Book. Let me assure you of something. I was Dark Horse's Comic Book Shop of the Month for October, so I KNOW COMICS. I have an 8 year old son,(Prolly rapiered & simonized) and I scrutinize VERY carefully what he reads, and SOCK MONKEY is one of his favorites.
I defy to prove your pornography charges vis a vis Sock Monkey, or be banished to the sockpuppet drawer, lifeless for all eternity.

Whats with this Crayonaut sockpuppet name, what are you fourteen?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Re: Sock Monkey
by the crayonaut » 20 Nov 2000, 22:24

Mr. Venooker,
You can say what you like but I am the one who will be living off money obtained as legal redress from Mr. Millionaire. I am also investigating the possibility of getting a restraining order against him. I hope that I do not need to get a restraining order against you too.
Obviously if you want to show your child explicit material that is your right, but it is not the life I wish to lead.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Sock Monkey
by tony millionaire » 20 Nov 2000, 22:39

See here, "Jack," if that's your real name, I can see through your plan to smear my name by insinuating that if your son can read pornographic material, then it's ok for other children to read it.