The tester of a hypothesis can sway the outcome by including or excluding certain criteria; if a person has the will, they can bend what seems to be science to fit any agenda they please.



Is global warming really happening? Or is it a shot by the government at global governance? If you can tax industries for something they all have, CO2 emissions, you rule the world.

Are we sure that our CO2 emissions are causing a man-made shift in climate? Higher CO2 levels also causes plant-life to flourish, which in turn leads to higher levels of oxygen.
How much of that carbon in the ancient sea-life deposits in the Earth's crust constitutes all the carbon that was at one point a part of our atmosphere?

If you dig for references to the claims, there really aren't any. Just poorly conducted studies with wide gaps left in them teeming with human error. But because the ones conducting the studies desire to show evidence for global warming, they aren't as picky for finding information that doesn't fit their agenda.

How many studies conducted go into overwhelming detail on how they gathered their data, what equipment they used to gather their data, how they ruled out variables, etc? I can't find any but if you can please post it

Global warming was like the big finale grand attempt of the liberals to once and for all prove conservatives as morally deficient (talk about projection).