Results 1 to 30 of 107

Hybrid View

  1. Collapse Details
     
    #1
    xoxo
    king steveyos
    Quote Originally Posted by blumpkin blownuts View Post
    When you span the angles, all that's left is this:
    Mind, is God.
    Force, is Machine.

    There are two "machines", which are openly connected. Mind is the energy-signal driving input, Force is the power signal prime mover.
    ah but I do not believe in a prime mover as it simply begs more questions of what came before

    positing a prime mover is a failure to concieve of infinity
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    I am postulate one blumpkin blownuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    subspace
    Posts
    7,162
    Quote Originally Posted by xoxo View Post
    ah but I do not believe in a prime mover as it simply begs more questions of what came before

    positing a prime mover is a failure to concieve of infinity
    every machine with driven elements has a prime mover. It is folly to attempt conception of infinity from even an ideal flywheel, by default.

    What came before the prime mover was the machine that built it, and the mind that deigned it.
    So it is then possible to conceive of negative infinity, working further backwards.
    Last edited by blumpkin blownuts; 12-01-2012 at 09:30 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    xoxo
    king steveyos
    Quote Originally Posted by blumpkin blownuts View Post
    every machine with driven elements has a prime mover. It is folly to attempt conception of infinity from even an ideal flywheel, by default.
    no the necessity of your mind to posit a prime mover results from your mind's failure to concieve of infinity and eternity which if you continue to "up" questions in philosophy you must ultimately reach and be unable to answer

    if at any stage you liken the universe to a man made machine or need to posit a prime mover or god in your conceptions then you have failed in "upping" your philosophical questions

    you see infinity falls in on itself when we try to concieve of it and so many who cannot properly concieve of infinity must posit a prime mover... however this is only a backstep and backpeddle in your philosophy because it still begs the question of what is the "prime mover" ... because if nothing moved the prime mover and nothing was before the prime mover then the prime mover is infinate and so therefore cannot even be a prime mover
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    I am postulate one blumpkin blownuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    subspace
    Posts
    7,162
    Define "prime mover", before I give you my definition. You're getting lost in a detail or trying to say I'm claiming something I never did. If we find this bottle-neck is due to your poor reading comprehension, then this game ends IMMEDIATELY.

    if at any stage you liken the universe to a man made machine or need to posit a prime mover or god in your conceptions then you have failed in "upping" your philosophical questions


    In a physical machine, the prime mover is moderated by the input Force (aka the excitation) to the initial driving element, e.g. a water wheel, a lightning bolt, an automotive starter assy. the prime mover is then the piece that transfers, at a predictable level, Force to all attached components of the machine.

    God is not a prime mover. God is related via it's own extension, Mind, to the input phase of an existential machine, or even a modern machine.

    Think: UserInput:Mind::EngineControls:Force
    Last edited by blumpkin blownuts; 12-01-2012 at 09:54 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    I am postulate one blumpkin blownuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    subspace
    Posts
    7,162
    oops dbl
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    xoxo
    king steveyos
    Quote Originally Posted by blumpkin blownuts View Post
    Define "prime mover", before I give you my definition. You're getting lost in a detail or trying to say I'm claiming something I never did. If we find this bottle-neck is due to your poor reading comprehension, then this game ends IMMEDIATELY.

    if at any stage you liken the universe to a man made machine or need to posit a prime mover or god in your conceptions then you have failed in "upping" your philosophical questions



    In a physical machine, the prime mover is moderated by the input Force (aka the excitation) to the initial driving element, e.g. a water wheel, a lightning bolt, an automotive starter assy. the prime mover is then the piece that transfers, at a predictable level, Force to all attached components of the machine.

    God is not a prime mover. God is related via it's own extension, Mind, to the input phase of an existential machine, or even a modern machine.
    Well a "prime mover" is a concept/THEORY in physics.... everything that is is in motion in the universe it in motion from being moved by another object... some theorists need to posit a "prime mover" as the idea that this movement is infinite is too much for their earthly bound physist mind to conceieve of

    it's all about potential and kinetic energy and shit however a "prime mover" really doesn't solve this conundrum in physics, is a mere theory and cannot be proven... it is also not even necessary to many a mind to have to posit for movement in the universe

    and so some in philosophy have adopted the THEORY of a prime mover as "proof" of a god... it does not prove a god and it does not even necessarily exist
    Last edited by xoxo; 12-01-2012 at 10:00 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    I am postulate one blumpkin blownuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    subspace
    Posts
    7,162
    Quote Originally Posted by xoxo View Post
    Well a "prime mover" is a concept/THEORY in physics.... everything that is is in motion in the universe it in motion from being moved by another object... some theorists need to posit a "prime mover" as the idea that this movement is infinite is too much for their earthly bound physist mind to conceieve of

    it's all about potential and kinetic energy and shit however a "prime mover" really doesn't solve this conundrum in physics, is a mere theory and cannot be proven... it is also not even necessary to many a mind to have to posit for movement in the universe

    and so some in philosophy have adopted the THEORY of a prime mover as "proof" of a god... it does not prove a god and it does not even necessarily exist
    i'm starting small with closed machines.
    in a machine the prime mover is the plant of Force. On a bicycle, the prime mover is the pedal blade which turns the chain, which turn the wheels. The prime mover's excitation is your feet pushing the pedals.
    Reply With Quote
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •