m0nde becomes indian version of steveyos

in some states they have no-fault insurance. this then makes each person pay for their own problems. this is even closer to the health insurance model.

my main point is about being mandated to pay for something. why are you for one mandate, when you're against the other? if you hit someone why not leave it up to the courts to have you claim damages from the other person if you believe they're at fault?

[maks]

in some states they have no-fault insurance. this then makes each person pay for their own problems. this is even closer to the health insurance model.

my main point is about being mandated to pay for something. why are you for one mandate, when you're against the other? if you hit someone why not leave it up to the courts to have you claim damages from the other person if you believe they're at fault?

It's not a mandate, it's a condition. I could stop driving a car and never pay another dime on car insurance. The only way out of Obamacare is to kill myself.