Results 1 to 30 of 343

Hybrid View

  1. Collapse Details
     
    #1
    Pariah :Care:y Plug Drugs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    an edgecastle for edgelords
    Posts
    11,801
    Quote Originally Posted by NortyNippy View Post
    nah she extends the concept into relations between the sexes, which is a more interesting point than you who just wanders off on some old fashioned fascist wrong idea
    so whenever you use the word "we" in a sentence when referring to a group/country/whatever that you are, by definition, a member of, you are subconsciously trying to imply that you own that group/country/whatever? Sounds like man-hating dike mischief to me
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    patrolled faggot you're a faggot NortyNippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,438
    Quote Originally Posted by Plug Drugs View Post
    so whenever you use the word "we" in a sentence when referring to a group/country/whatever that you are, by definition, a member of, you are subconsciously trying to imply that you own that group/country/whatever? Sounds like man-hating dike mischief to me
    lol well it's not and no not quite, I'm asking you to think about where you draw the metaphorical line between "us" and "them". Who is "us" to you? And who is "they" to you? and why do you draw the line where you do?

    think about it some more, it will do you some good
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    v me in love v Camoron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Swampland
    Posts
    13,095
    Quote Originally Posted by NortyNippy View Post
    lol well it's not and no not quite, I'm asking you to think about where you draw the metaphorical line between "us" and "them". Who is "us" to you? And who is "they" to you? and why do you draw the line where you do?

    think about it some more, it will do you some good

    you're being needlessly philosophical about what is ultimately a case of semantics

    spergin hard
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    patrolled faggot you're a faggot NortyNippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,438
    Quote Originally Posted by Camoron View Post
    you're being needlessly philosophical about what is ultimately a case of semantics

    spergin hard
    lol

    I'll stop now

    vote Obama, he is good.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    v me in love v Camoron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Swampland
    Posts
    13,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Obnoxious Bitch View Post
    Sadly, I think I might be the only one on this site that will.
    i thought you said anyone who voted was a "sheeple" or soemthing
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    no new niggers lnopia the great's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    pound town
    Posts
    5,626
    well i meant ob and the other man girl but i guess that works too




    **This account has been officially hacked and the original user is not liable for any future posts**
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Pariah :Care:y Plug Drugs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    an edgecastle for edgelords
    Posts
    11,801
    If anyone using the word "we" becomes subject to an existential debate of what "we" is, then we should all be paralyzed trying to conceive of what "I" is; aren't "I" just what others encourage me to be, whether I want to be or not? Aren't I made up at the molecular level of what I eat and have eaten - so aren't I technically mostly cows/chickens and corn/wheat -- or particles left over from an ancient supernova?

    We must examine OB's motives to narrow down the existential argument; what could she be after? Progression in existential philosophical thought, or justifying her hate towards one of the sexes?
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #8
    patrolled faggot you're a faggot NortyNippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,438
    Quote Originally Posted by Plug Drugs View Post
    If anyone using the word "we" becomes subject to an existential debate of what "we" is, then we should all be paralyzed trying to conceive of what "I" is; aren't "I" just what others encourage me to be, whether I want to be or not? Aren't I made up at the molecular level of what I eat and have eaten - so aren't I technically mostly cows/chickens and corn/wheat -- or particles left over from an ancient supernova?

    We must examine OB's motives to narrow down the existential argument; what could she be after? Progression in existential philosophical thought, or justifying her hate towards one of the sexes?
    I don't think you should be mentally paralyzed by thought but I think you should continue to have the thought in order to open the boundaries of the concept of what is between the two and when you can't define the concept anymore that is when you understand the foundation of what was previously a reified idea

    and I think you project a lot of your lack of truly being able to define a reified concept mix that with the lack of confidence in you even having a defined sexuality onto OB's self assurance of how she defines herself and the concept.
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #9
    Pariah :Care:y Plug Drugs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    an edgecastle for edgelords
    Posts
    11,801
    Quote Originally Posted by NortyNippy View Post
    I don't think you should be mentally paralyzed by thought but I think you should continue to have the thought in order to open the boundaries of the concept of what is between the two and when you can't define the concept anymore that is when you understand the foundation of what was previously a reified idea
    so we should only have a thought when it is convenient for and benefits us
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #10
    Pariah :Care:y Plug Drugs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    an edgecastle for edgelords
    Posts
    11,801
    Quote Originally Posted by NortyNippy View Post
    lol well it's not and no not quite, I'm asking you to think about where you draw the metaphorical line between "us" and "them". Who is "us" to you? And who is "they" to you? and why do you draw the line where you do?

    think about it some more, it will do you some good
    Well, I am a legal citizen of the United States so I guess using "we" when referring to the population of the United States would be accurate for me to use; and I'm not Chinese so, from a purely grammatical point of view, it would be inaccurate for me to use "we" when talking about the population of China
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #11
    patrolled faggot you're a faggot NortyNippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,438
    Quote Originally Posted by Plug Drugs View Post
    Well, I am a legal citizen of the United States so I guess using "we" when referring to the population of the United States would be accurate for me to use; and I'm not Chinese so, from a purely grammatical point of view, it would be inaccurate for me to use "we" when talking about the population of China
    no see the line is a concept

    and not a grammatical one
    Reply With Quote
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •