teach me how to touch a boob and also how to add extra words into badly written sentences in a vain attempt to very much rectify the vast majority of looking smarter than I actually am

i wholeheartedly disagree with this.
The vast majority of games that do this objectifying fall into 3 categories:
1) older games: These titles and marketing documents were (mostly) developed while the gaming market was still very much maturing, and like most processes of maturation, the games industry did do wrong, this is an example of such, and the industry has (mostly) rectified this, to the point where titles like Duke Nukem Forever is singled out and actively criticised for it's old-school misogynism. These titles do not represent the market today.
2) Crime simulators or games that take place in a seedy criminal underworld. The objectification here is done as part of setting the atmosphere of seediness and corruption. That's not misogynism, that's just making a believable setting. Do you really think a criminal underworld is going to care about political correctness?
3) Games set in historical eras. This is usually because that's how women WERE treated at that time period. IUt's not misogynism to represent something based on (largely) historical fact.