I really think I should consider and would be justified in suing the pharmaceutical company. They didn't adequately illustrate the need to consider whether the desired benefits of the medication would outweigh the possibility of permanent side effects. Were "permanent side effects" even acknowledged with words anywhere in the medicine's brochure?
I know I'd be pretty justified legally in suing, but I guess I just feel like the experience of a courtroom and legal matters is too adult for me and I wouldn't know how to keep my impetus