Here's something good I wrote earlier though, i think it may be a break through in physics,

[Plug Drugs]

Intellectual property of alias/pen name "Plug Drugs" at rubycalaber.com, also posted on scienceforums.net
Please contact me online for permission if you wish to duplicate elsewhere.

1. Since the waves of all fundamental forces are sinusoidal, then acceleration of a particle by a fundamental force can only produce sinusoidal curvature in the particle's trajectory.



2. Since the direction a particle is traveling in can only change from being accelerated by a force, and forces only curve a particle's path sinusoidally, then particles' trajectories can only ever curve, without there ever being sharp angles; when there seems to be a sharp angle in trajectory, viewed at a small enough scale there would only be sinusoidal curvature.



3. Since trajectories of particles only consist of sinusoidal curves, and a particle is affected by forces from every direction constantly with their intensity diminishing over distance as a ratio of a sphere's radius to its surface area, the distribution of the intensity of surrounding waves of force in a section of spacetime would also fall off as a sinusoidal curve. Thus, the path of any particle when plotted out would be coiling in shape.



4. Due to the intrinsic geometry of a coil, the clockwise or counterclockwise orientation of a coil is unchanging, and is preserved no matter how the coil is flipped or rotated. As long as the coil only consists of curves, the clockwise/counterclockwise orientation stays the same, and can only change from sharp angles in the coil - at which point it technically ceases to be a coil.



5. Since waves of force are produced by a particle whenever it is accelerated, and since a coiling trajectory is constant acceleration, waves of force constantly propagate out from a particle as the trajectory of the particle curves.



6. The waves of force produced from the coiling trajectory of a particle would also maintain a coiling shape while propagating out from the particle, with the clockwise/counterclockwise orientation of the coiling preserved as well.



7. Particles affected by waves of force with opposite clockwise/counterclockwise orientations in the coiling of their trajectories, would, for geometrical reasons, be highly inclined to be 'stalled' in the oppositely-coiling waves of force produced by the other particle, the latter particle would also be inclined to become 'stalled' in the force waves coming from the former particle. The resulting effect would be predicted to appear similar to attractive 'pairing' between opposite charges.



Is any part of all that definitely not correct or most probably wrong?

If you have graphing software, you could put the 'sinusoidal coiling' preserving its clockwise/counterclockwise orientation to the test: try to curve the trajectory of a point particle with only sinusoidal curves, and the forces accelerating can't cheat the inverse square law. I think you'll find that the more you try to implement sharp curves, the more you will displace the particle, and that to have higher intensity waves of force requires more mass/energy considered over a larger volume, which will be lost to entropy of the system, or would affect all nearby particles to a similar extent, and the particle would still have a coiling trajectory relative to those particles. You'd probably need to consider extreme scenarios like supernovae, quasars, particle colliders, or black holes.

If you tried using powerful equipment to knock a particle back and forth between alternating electromagnets to get a non-sinusoidal curve in the particle's trajectory, you could still only decrease the diameter of the coil to smaller and smaller scales so its hard to observe, or drown it out with other signals, but the frequency of the coiling would still be present no matter how tiny. Coiling trajectory is also true at the largest of scales; celestial bodies orbiting each other are moving through space in pseudo-unison while in orbit with each other, making their trajectory through space-time coiled.



Another possible way to view the concept geometrically I was thinking of (it could be false though, I don't know); consider the distance between two particles with the distance between them growing/shrinking due to forces affecting the particles trajectory - the change in distance graphed on an XY coordinate grid would be indistinguishable from two points moving along the circumferences of two separate ellipses, with the dimensions of the ellipses changing randomly to match their real movements in spacetime, and graphing the change instead as the changing curvature proportional to the rate they're traveling the circumference. The graphed increase/decrease in both cases would also consist of sinusoidal curves. Relative to each other, the two particles could be thought of as coiling orthogonal to the plane of the two ellipses