[not a joke or a gimmick] rare video of the first time jon and cag met

[timmy]

KARL MARX WAS A BLACK MAN STOP STEALING AND APPROPRIATING BLACK HISTORY

[maks]

KARL MARX WAS A BLACK MAN STOP STEALING AND APPROPRIATING BLACK HISTORY

The problem is that people don't give a shit. There are multiple levels to all this stuff.
Nepiophile would be toddlers and infants (0-3).
Pedophile is prepubescent (4-10).
Hebephile is pubescent (11-14).
Ephebophile is post-pubescent (15-19) which in my mind is pretty much saying "biologically normal, but legal grey area because all countries and states are different".
Teleiophile is adults.
Gerontophile is elderly adults.
Now the SPECIFICS can be kinda wacky though since there can be a lot of overlap since these aren't SPECIFICALLY about age, but about physical development. It's also about PRIMARY sexual interest. If you are only into teenagers then you can be a hebephile or ephebophile, but if you are primary into young-looking adult, but ALSO have a sexual attraction to teenagers, you wouldn't be.
But you could STILL be a pedophile if you are really into a 13 year old that just hasn't started puberty yet, and you could also be a hebephile if you are really into an 8 year old that started puberty early.
If you so strictly by ages though, Nepi, Pedo, and Hebe are all "bad and evil" according to society, and Ephe would be "normal depending on where you live" since age of consent can be 15-18.
You would THINK that as people get older though, their primary target of sexual interest would be people within their own age group, but we KNOW that is not the case whatsoever. It's why "cougars" target the freshly adult male population, and why rich old dudes target the fresh adult female population.
There could also be a psychological association with when you first experienced a sexual discovery or had sex in the first place and you only want those that are the age group of the other person you had the experience with.
There are people who want a lowering of the age of consent, which makes rational/biological sense, but if you drop it to 13 or so (when sexual/breeding development SHOULD be "ready"), it's an somewhat arbitrary number, and therefor it would be "legal" to have sex with a 13 year old that may not have even started puberty yet.
It's honestly why I think laws based on AGE don't make a lot of sense. When to have sex, when to smoke or drink, when to allow driving, or voting, or whatever. It's just an arbitrary number that was decided for "some reason".

Maybe some of the excerpts can make it into jon and cags (jags) wedding slide show

Esp the parts about beating children and cag coming to terms with being an unemployed sex worker