When is the radiation ionizing? It already generates alternating current.. but direct current, like a displaced electron? Well, the distance the electron travels over time around the nucleus times the number of wave fronts making up the electron above the minimal number for recurrence would lead us to guesstimate roughly that the length of an orbital would merely require there to be Max-actual number of wave fronts for electron recurrence in that orbital present in a distance less than that orbitals width...
So... More than 16 million wave fronts in a millimeter could ionize hydrogen if only requiring 1 more wave front to be past maximal
Results 1 to 30 of 119
Hybrid View
-
04-16-2018
Last edited by Plug Drugs; 04-16-2018 at 12:07 AM.
-
04-16-2018
"Maximal" as a term is referring to maximum number of external wave fronts before an electron is displaced from its orbital
Not to be confused with maxima, although that would have technical basis as well, as an electron originates in some way from one side of a wavefront maxima, the other side having opposite properties
To go past maximal would imply that it has reverted across some earlier point of maxima on that wave front, and thus some quantum number must changeLast edited by Plug Drugs; 04-16-2018 at 12:40 AM.
-
04-16-2018
In fact I could state that as my own principle: if a section of a wave front changes trajectory from an interaction such that it reverts across a previously present maxima in that wave front, then some quantum number (charge, spin, orbital, flavour, color, etc.) must change.
-
04-16-2018
Another principle: all quantum numbers must have at an earlier time had a wavefront function maxima corresponding with it. If a section of that wavefront reverts across that maxima, the corresponding quantum number for that maxima has changed for that wavefront section.
-
-
04-16-2018
You don't understand the insanity of trust trading Elz; simply because the 'board is moving' and it would be hypothetically easier now in the future for Disney to convince the world that they own the songs played in the movie Fantasia, because they managed to possibly erase one of the song's history, they begin swapping money, deals, trust ownerships, etc..
-
04-16-2018
The song was composed by a German composer, and in German was called "Der Zauberlehrling".. but if Der Zauberlehrling ends up being some different song and a copyright office worker glances over it because they only bothered to check YouTube (which isn't how people think anymore anyways because the internet is dead/dying) and let Disney then 'own' the song, theyll make a fuck ton of money for requiring tribute to be able to play it, or cross promotion like it's use in a car ad around the same time as a Fantasia rerelease, and also strengthening their ownership of Fantasia (which an argument could be made that it would become public domain if enough of its content consists of public domain material)
-
04-16-2018
They've strengthened stock in Disney by gutting history
-
04-16-2018
I highly doubt someone did it just for the thrill of watching the aftermath; someone paid pianists to show up and play a nonsense series of notes on different grand pianos, then label the song "Der Zauberlehrling" in different videos
Just so that the public knowledge of "Der Zauberlehrling" might some day change to no longer be the same song a in Fantasia.Last edited by Plug Drugs; 04-16-2018 at 03:51 AM.
-
04-16-2018
$10-15 million if they gain ownership of Der Zauberlehrling and can charge for its use on radio and on TV etc,
And 1 billion if it stops the movie Fantasia from some day becoming public domain
-
04-16-2018
A rerelease of Fantasia every 15 years generates like 150-400 million for Disney each time they do it.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)







