earlier elz was trying to say he was stupid for not knowing how to act because the media will mischaracterize him. well he isn't stupid and is well aware of this fact so why would he give them anything like tax returns if he wasn't forced to? only people with a partisan agenda care about his tax returns because the people who elected him trust that his business was at the very most not any more compromised than the same unions and corporations their livelihoods depend on. think 'the almighty dollar'he shit on transparency by refusing to show his tax return,
i agree it sucks how the constitution and bill of rights only really apply to the government's interpretation of them. the framework should work so elected reps reflect 'we the peoples' will since the constitution protects both citizens and non citizens. but the travel bans and him beating back the daca stuff has also effectively immunized our nation from the migrant crisis occurring in europe. sure think of the families if you want but don't forget about the end game of uncontrolled immigration of fighting aged males. plus isn't it obvious theses refugees and immigrants are used at the polls to prop up the hemorrhaging support for corrupt dems?shit on the first amendment with the travel ban,
im in favor of assimilation- reservations will never be anything more than casino fed ghettos with poor education, drug abuse, and overall poor quality of life. just give them all the same rights as us and they can preserve their cultures in mostly the same way. as for the pipeline im not in favor of coal oil or gas just like any other sane person but is it really any different for our planet if we're dependent on the same oil from saudi arabia- the pipeline would effectively remove the thumb they hold over us. dems like hillary and hussein who receive kickbacks from the middle east and obstruct industry in the states want to cripple our nation in order to keep funding whatever the fuck their ultimate agenda would be- tyrannical power or nuclear war- who knows?stolen land from a sovereign indian nation for the dakota pipeline,
i can't find any info about what you're talking about. i did find the fair credit billing act which protects consumers from unfair billing practices but doesn't extend to installment contracts. maybe there is more you can tell me?killed the right to sue creditors over payment disputes,
sorry same deal- i see that he signed an executive order increasing the work requirements for welfare recipients but nothing on 'work programs'. idk if this is relevant but a bloated welfare state isn't healthy for anyone but the neolibs and neocons who want socioeconomic stratification.took away the states' right to design their own work programs for welfare recipients,
freezing the assets of people suspected (but not always convicted) of participating in criminal activities? am i off, is this what you're talking about? how do you enforce the law and be really nice and civil towards the suspected criminals?violated property rights by reversing a ban on civil forfeiture,
gender dysphoria is a mental illness. idc if people cut their dick off but there is something to be said about having the mentally ill attempting to serve in the military.the right to volunteer for the military if I decided to cut my dick off,
it was never a right it was a regulation stopping ISPs from selling your data without your consent that was struck down. ISPs don't necessarily want to tank their credibility with the consumers by being exposed selling data. the real issue isn't with the ISPs who have to compete in the market place- its the social media platforms that have what are effectively monopolies over the dissemination of information of their users virtual intellectual properties. if a ISP was caught throttling bandwidth to conservative websites- the consumer in outrage will switch providers but when facebook twitter and youtube have an obvious liberal bias and censor, or screw with the notifications to subscribers, or sick bots against the pages of any conservative content creators (or anyone who goes against their agenda this includes REAL libertarians who are being cast by the MSM as 'nazi gate keepers') they now can no longer effectively spread their content to the same number of people as 'accepted narratives'. I support the right to anonymity and free speech including the inability of any isp or platform to censor based on religion, race, sex, political views, etc... (obviously illegal content like CP needs to be removed). the user needs to be given an ability to block any content they don't want to see- its currently being controlled by a BS algorithm that amounts to nothing more than a left wing bias. i think people are trying to codify these rights under the name 'internet bill of rights'. by the way- notice how all the social media platform's get everyone's dick up about net neutrality (which is fine but doesn't go far enough at all), its just a distraction so sheep will be complacent as so called 'extremist content' gets censored.the right to opt out of ISP data sharing,
again this was never a right, hussein obama was voluntarily disclosing the names of white house visitors (prolly cuz he didn't do SHIT when he was in the white house, especially the first two years of basically DEM super-majority). if trump had to he would have been forced to disclose. as for his claim that its a national security risk hes absolutely right. the election was rigged, the mueller probe is part desperate attempt at impeachment and a clinton coup. have you ever heard of the clinton body count? what about mcmaster's father- what about seth rich. i am totally in favor of transparency but you're failing to see this from a pragmatic stance.and the right to see a list of visitors to the white house
how you consider his actions to be authoritarian, i see as you harboring some sort of idyllic world view of what elected officials should and shouldn't be doing. I consider these 'authoritarian policies' to be completely pragmatic and if you consider this some kind of weakness in my support of trump let me ask you this- what politician's policies have you been in favor of? someone like ron paul? im just asking because you said you have disdain for anyone who runs for office- of course i completely understand the whole keep government shut down fuck it perspective if that's where you're coming from.
Thread: Lily has nigger family members
Results 1 to 30 of 493
Threaded View
-
05-19-2018
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)