hey lonnie

[maks]

I would say "if the acusations against trump were all true, i would agree that its a big problem"

They don't have to all be true, every one is big enough to end his administration. Shit, none of them needs to be true. They only need to be proven true. But lets be honest, a bunch of them are true and Trump is too stupid and arrogant to cover his tracks very well.

The Cohen thing is about hush money for porn star sex LMFAO

Paying off a porn star isn't a federal crime, but misappropriation of campaign funds is.

OMGerosa isn't the federal government [your glacial pace comment]

I wasn't actually talking about her. She doesn't have anything criminally damaging, only politically damaging. And as a former reality show contestant (that this moron brought into the white house) she'll hold onto the really good stuff until it can do the most for her public profile and pocketbook

of course the new york attorney general is gonna use his power to fuck trump

You'd better hope he doesn't have anything. The feds can't indite a sitting president, but the states can.

why are you turned on by his BS?

Because I don't actually care, I'm in it for the drama. I made this thread to rub it in, and I'm glad I did. Your confidence is gone, you're sweating, grasping at straws, posting tweets like they mean a damn thing. I find that humorous.

[Lina Goldberg]

They don't have to all be true, every one is big enough to end his administration. Shit, none of them needs to be true. They only need to be proven true. But lets be honest, a bunch of them are true and Trump is too stupid and arrogant to cover his tracks very well.

who cares this is all entirely about Hillary losing the election and democrats trying to recover.

Paying off a porn star isn't a federal crime, but misappropriation of campaign funds is.

…[R]egardless of what Cohen agreed to in a plea bargain, hush-money payments to mistresses are not really campaign expenditures. It is true that “contribution” and “expenditure” are defined in the Federal Election Campaign Act as anything “for the purpose of influencing any election,” and it may have been intended and hoped that paying hush money would serve that end. The problem is that almost anything a candidate does can be interpreted as intended to “influence an election,” from buying a good watch to make sure he gets to places on time, to getting a massage so that he feels fit for the campaign trail, to buying a new suit so that he looks good on a debate stage. Yet having campaign donors pay for personal luxuries — such as expensive watches, massages and Brooks Brothers suits — seems more like bribery than funding campaign speech.

I wasn't actually talking about her. She doesn't have anything criminally damaging, only politically damaging. And as a former reality show contestant (that this moron brought into the white house) she'll hold onto the really good stuff until it can do the most for her public profile and pocketbook

i said this but you repackaged it and said nigger tape thanks a lot

You'd better hope he doesn't have anything. The feds can't indite a sitting president, but the states can.

okay maybe the states can get around to impeachment after paying off the sexually abused legal interns and you can cheer them on!!

Because I don't actually care, I'm in it for the drama. I made this thread to rub it in, and I'm glad I did. Your confidence is gone, you're sweating, grasping at straws, posting tweets like they mean a damn thing. I find that humorous.

whatever i'm a fan of the drama too, if i was crying all the time i would be like crying elz and getting owned but i'm just having a laugh at how a guy like yourself is gonna come at me with tabloid headlines and say HA OWNED LOOK HE'S SHAKING lol

[maks]

denial ain't just a river in brazil, girlfren.

[Lina Goldberg]

Your confidence is gone, you're sweating, grasping at straws, posting tweets like they mean a damn thing.

i haven't posted a single tweet i've only quoted tom fitton and bradley smith. there is a trump tweet in the Washington Times article but i didn't quote it

[maks]

i haven't posted a single tweet i've only quoted tom fitton and bradley smith. there is a trump tweet in the Washington Times article but i didn't quote it

the article was literally an examination of a single tweet

[Lina Goldberg]

the article was literally an examination of a single tweet

hey its not my favorite article in the world but its important because its a reputable outlet that published fittons statement about the warrants to spy on trump never even went before a FISA court. people like you who find it inconvenient just choose to ignore it

[maks]

hey its not my favorite article in the world but its important because its a reputable outlet that published fittons statement about the warrants to spy on trump never even went before a FISA court. people like you who find it inconvenient just choose to ignore it

I choose to ignore it because it is, in its entirety, an examination of a trump tweet

[Lina Goldberg]

I choose to ignore it because it is, in its entirety, an examination of a trump tweet

Because I don't actually care, I'm in it for the drama.