Penalties for SSDI Fraud

[aber]

There are severe penalties for Social Security card fraud and disability fraud.

Felony criminal penalties can be up to $250,000 in fines and/or up to five years jail time. On top of the criminal penalties, there may be civil penalties as well. A person found guilty of fraud may be sued in civil court and have to pay a large fine, and may have his or her professional license suspended. Each false statement a person made by signing a form or statement while knowing that he or she was not eligible can result in fines up to $5,000.

[aber]

If you believe there is a possibility that someone you know is committing fraud against the Social Security Administration (SSA), there are several things you can do.

If you have enough facts and you are confident the person is committing fraud, visit the SSA website. Here you will see that there are several ways to report fraud. There is an online form, a mailing address, a fraud hotline you can call (800-269-0271), and a FAX number (410-597-0118). When making the report, give as many details that you can, especially the name of the person committing fraud and his or her address, phone number, birthdate, and Social Security number. Explain how you think the person is committing fraud or falsely claiming benefits, a general timeline if you are aware of it, and include the names of other people who may also be aware of the fraud.

Featured Social Security Disability Law Firms In Apollo, PA CHANGE LOCATION
Schmitt & Coletta, P.C.Schmitt & Coletta, P.C.
4.4/5.0 100%
888-314-4794 CONTACT
Legal Rights Advocates Law Firm, PLLCLegal Rights Advocates Law Firm, PLLC
no peer reviews
100%
877-232-5056 CONTACT
Caroselli, Beachler, & Coleman, LLCCaroselli, Beachler, & Coleman, LLC
4.7/5.0 100%
View Phone # CONTACT
CONTACT ALL
VIEW ALL ›
This report can by anonymous, but the SSA doe request your contact information. If you provide your contact information, the SSA can contact you for further information. The agency may need to contact you before completing the investigation.

[Woodland Management]

ok we got it

[Unregistered]

let's put that fucker behind bars where he belongs

I just want him to pay back the several thousand dollars he stole from the hard working people of the state of Rhode island

[Unregistered]

ok i'm going to be a paki dash driver wash dishes at Gino's

State of Rhode Island: Department of Human Services

State of Rhode Island

Department of Human Services

Report Fraud

Alert! We all have an obligation to work together in stopping fraud. Fraud does great damage to our system, and makes it more difficult to serve Rhode Islanders in need.

How to report Fraud or Misuse:

Online: Office of Internal Audit Fraud Complaint Form

By phone: Call the Fraud Unit at (401) 574-8175. Please leave a message, and we will process your call promptly.

By mail: You may send a report to:

Fraud Detection and Prevention Unit
One Capitol Hill
Providence, RI 02908

More information: RI Office of Management and Budget - Office of Internal Audit

What is Fraud?

Fraud occurs when a person makes false statements, and/or misrepresents facts or circumstances to the Department of Human Services in order to illegally receive cash assistance (RI Works), food assistance (SNAP), child care assistance (CCAP), general public assistance (GPA), long term care (LTC), child support services, rehabilitative services, veterans benefits, and Medicaid.

What is Misuse and Provider Fraud?

Misuse occurs when providers operate in ways inconsistent with sound fiscal, business, or medical practices. Misuse can result in great financial harm to both human services programs and Medicaid. Provider fraud can involve illegal practices from child care providers, doctors, dentists, nursing homes, home healthcare, medical equipment providers, pharmacies, mental health facilities, laboratories, transportation services, and more.

Examples of Fraud and Misuse:

- Failure to report income, insurance, or money received

- Failure to report the return of an absent parent to the home

- Failure to report a child out of the home

- Failure to report property or assets

- Claiming Rhode Island residence while living out of state

- Actively seeking drugs

- Committing crimes resulting in incarceration

- Providers receiving bills for services never provided

- Providers misrepresenting credentials

- Billing irregularities from providers

https://www.providencejournal.com/ar...NEWS/150219808

R.I.‘s GOP lawmakers renew campaign against ‘welfare fraud and abuse’

PROVIDENCE, R.I. – - Rep. Patricia Morgan, the one-time chairwoman of the state GOP, is leading a Republican lawmakers’ campaign against perceived — and in some cases, documented — “waste, abuse, and fraud in Rhode Island’s welfare support system.”

Two years ago, The Providence Journal did an analysis of six months of 2012 spending data that found a relatively tiny amount — $3,999 — of federal “food-assistance” dollars had been spent by Rhode Island “EBT” cardholders, during that period, at liquor stores. The majority of the purchases were at a single liquor store in Woonsocket.

A deeper probe found Rhode Islanders with these Electronic Benefits Transfer cards using them at the Twin River casino, in one case, an Allens Avenue adult video store in another, a Pawtucket “House of Cigars” and several other “smoke shops.”

On Tuesday, Morgan, a Republican from West Warwick, served notice that she has introduced four bills.

“We have the fifth highest benefit levels in the country,” Morgan said. “We cannot sit idle and watch those who abuse our system continue to hurt not only taxpayers, but the integrity of the programs truly needy Rhode Islanders depend on.”

Two of her bills deal with the potential for Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) card abuse. Two others focus on Medicaid.

In Morgan’s words: the EBT card is similar to an ATM card; the Office of Health and Human Services deposits a recipient’s monthly welfare benefits on this card. The goal of this program is to provide food assistance for low-income individuals and as such, EBT cards are restricted from purchasing certain types of goods.

“Unfortunately, I have heard some folks are selling these food benefits for half of their face value for cash to purchase other non-food items,” she said. “This practice is illegal and subverts the intent of the program, to help provide food assistance for the needy.

“The individual is not buying food with the money and the purchaser of the EBT card is an unqualified recipient of taxpayer funds. Our beleaguered taxpayers can’t afford that abuse. And it weakens the program for those who really need the help. ”

Morgan’s bill would require a photo I.D. for the use of an EBT Card. (“Written into my bill will be an exception for caregivers,” she said.)

A second bill reflects the continued effort by State House Republicans to prohibit use of EBT cards for non-essentials, such as liquor and Lottery tickets, and at casinos and adult book stores.

Her other two bills would increase penalties for making fraudulent Medicaid claims.

“The punishments for making false statements to wrongly receive benefits had not been increased since 1966. These bills will hopefully serve as a deterrent by increasing the fines to $500 for individuals and $1,000 plus one year imprisonment for providers,” she said.

Her bills have not yet been scheduled for hearing, but have run into various arguments in past years.

In 2013, Sandra Powell, the state’s then-director of the Department of Human Services, said a new federal law barred use of the EBT cards in liquor stores, casinos or gambling establishments, and “any retail establishments which provides adult entertainment in which performers disrobe or perform in an unclothed state for entertainment.”

Powell said the department “would welcome a bill reflecting these federal prohibitions,” but she also said the federal guidelines allow states to restrict venues, “not specific goods or services,” and she questioned the “technological feasibility of enforcing” the law proposed at that time by Morgan.

At the same 2013 hearing, Kathleen S. Gorman, a professor at the University of Rhode Island and director of the university’s Feinstein Hunger Center, said federal rules do not allow states to require photo IDs for people using the EBT cards.

She also said the photo-ID bill would cause logistical problems when the cards are issued to a head of household but can also be used by others in the family.

kgregg@providencejournal.com

(401) 277-707

[Unregistered]

let's put that fucker behind bars where he belongs

[Unregistered]

modne do not

[Unregistered]

get him

[Unregistered]

Actively seeking drugs

[Unregistered]

this is about steffies goutmaster, not lisa

We all have an obligation to work together in stopping fraud. Fraud does great damage to our system, and makes it more difficult to serve Rhode Islanders in need.

http://www.dhs.ri.gov/Fraud/ReportFraud.php

[Unregistered]

restarting my sim because I was told to restart it now and then even though it's running fine idk

[Unregistered]

fuk off modne go back home

[Unregistered]

https://www.twitch.tv/steveyos

[Unregistered]

stupid brown pos go home

make sure Stevey pays back the money he owes the hard working people if Rhode Island

http://www.dhs.ri.gov/Fraud/ReportFraud.php

[Unregistered]

https://www.twitch.tv/steveyos

[Unregistered]

make sure Stevey pays back the money he owes the hard working people if Rhode Island

http://www.dhs.ri.gov/Fraud/ReportFraud.php

if

We all have an obligation to work together in stopping fraud. Fraud does great damage to our system, and makes it more difficult to serve Rhode Islanders in need.

http://www.dhs.ri.gov/Fraud/ReportFraud.php

[Stephen]

mom said i don't have to work cause i didn't finish da ninf grade

get your ged, Stevey and become a Walmart security guard

[Stephen]

do they hire neck beards lots of hot chicks at Walmart

[Unregistered]

let's put that fucker behind bars where he belongs

https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/researc...-welfare-fraud

The Pew Charitable Trusts

What Happens When States Go Hunting for Welfare Fraud

STATELINE ARTICLE
May 24, 2017
By: Jen Fifield
Topics: Safety Net & Budget

By the time Illinois decided to crack down on Medicaid fraud in 2012, state officials knew that many people enrolled in the program probably weren’t eligible. For years, caseworkers hadn’t had the time or resources to check.

To catch up, the state hired a private contractor to identify people who might not be eligible for the low-income health program and to make recommendations for whose benefits should be canceled. Within about a year, Illinois had canceled benefits for nearly 150,000 people whose eligibility could not be verified — and saved an estimated $70 million.

Now, faced with growing Medicaid enrollment and tight budgets, Republican lawmakers in several other states are taking similar steps to ensure that people receiving welfare benefits are eligible for them. Under their proposals, which are modeled on legislation drafted by a national conservative group, recipients would face tougher and more frequent eligibility checks. And the checks could be conducted by private contractors who are motivated to justify their hiring by knocking as many people as possible off the rolls.

Mississippi enacted a law in April that will require the state to hire a private contractor to create a new computer system to review and more frequently check the eligibility of people participating in Medicaid and the federal food stamps program, formally called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Similar bills are being considered in Oklahoma and Ohio, and Missouri and Wyoming enacted similar laws last year.

Supporters say the measures will root out fraud in the welfare system. Fraud, overpayments and underpayments in all assistance programs cost federal and state governments about $136.7 billion in 2015, out of about $2.8 trillion spent in assistance overall.

In Mississippi, people “are intentionally scamming the system,” said state Sen. Josh Harkins, a Republican who supported the new law there. “This is to make sure we aren’t just carelessly spending state tax dollars.”

But Democratic policy analysts and advocates for people on welfare say that while it’s important to try to reduce fraud, the proposals go about it the wrong way. Roy Mitchell, executive director of the Mississippi Health Advocacy Program, says the bills are meant to sweep even eligible families off the system. “You basically put a bounty on Medicaid recipients,” Mitchell said.

The most concerning part of the new Mississippi law and the other proposals, Mitchell and others say, is that they give people who receive benefits as little as 10 days to respond when they are asked for more information to prove their eligibility. If they don’t respond or can’t provide the information, their benefits are canceled.

Welfare recipients move often, and many will miss the request, Mitchell said. People will be forced off the system, he said, just to re-enroll shortly after — a phenomenon referred to as “churn.”

In Illinois, the state saw savings when it first stepped up eligibility checks. But about 20 percent of those who were kicked off the rolls re-enrolled a short time later, according to state data. Most simply fail at first to respond to the state’s request for information.

Model Legislation
The recent proposals follow model legislation drafted by the Foundation for Government Accountability, a Florida-based nonprofit that favors free-market principles. The point, said Jonathan Ingram, the foundation’s vice president of research, is to preserve finite government resources by ensuring that only eligible people are receiving benefits.

Many states, such as Oregon, are facing a backlog in verifying the eligibility of people enrolled in welfare programs. In a survey last year, officials from six states told the Kaiser Family Foundation that they were facing delays in confirming eligibility for Medicaid recipients, due mostly to challenges with their computer system or staff capacity.

Federal law generally requires eligibility checks once a year for Medicaid recipients and every six months for SNAP recipients, although that varies based on age, disability status and other factors. Eligibility requirements vary by program, but, generally, recipients must prove they make under a certain amount of money, are U.S. citizens and are residents of the state.

To verify citizenship and income, states use information from federal agencies, such as the Social Security Administration. About half of states also use a service provided by Equifax, a consumer credit reporting agency, to get more up-to-date information about wages when verifying Medicaid eligibility.

Many states rely on what recipients tell them about where they live and how many people they live with, which helps determine whether their household is eligible. Some state agencies cross-check the information applicants provide with other state agencies, inside or outside of their state.

The model legislation would require recipients to prove their identity. It would allow states to hire a contractor to collect personal information about welfare recipients, and would require the state to check any information that might indicate a change in eligibility at least quarterly. (The Mississippi law requires the state to hire a private contractor.) The state would also be required to explore joining a multi-state cooperative to identify individuals enrolled in other states.

Under the model, the state, not the contractor, would make the final decision about whether someone continues to receive benefits. And the amount the state saves by removing people from the rolls must exceed that spent to pay the contractors — a provision that could mean outside firms lose their state contract if they don’t flag enough ineligible recipients.

Mitchell said the bills are wrongly targeted at welfare recipients when they should be targeted at health care providers, such as doctors and pharmacists, who often commit fraud.

In general, states are already doing most of what is outlined in the bills, said Stacy Dean, vice president for food assistance policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. But, in instances where they aren’t, Dean and others say that hiring staff or updating computer systems would help, more than hiring an outside firm.

The bills are predicated, she said, on “the false narrative that SNAP and Medicaid are in crisis, that state administrators are bad at their job, and that low-income people are committing fraud.”

When states do start to check with more frequency, it increases the amount of churn, Dean said, and that can be costly to states. One national study found that administering agencies spend between $400 and $600 per person who is removed from the rolls and then re-enrolled.

Flagging Fraud
States that look more closely to ensure that people receiving benefits are eligible often find erroneous payments, as Minnesota did.

On average, about 4.8 percent of assistance payments by federal and state government agencies were made in error in 2015, according to a 2016 GAO report. The error rate for SNAP was estimated at about 3.7 percent and for Medicaid at about 9.8 percent.

States are particularly concerned with erroneous Medicaid payments because the program is expensive, at nearly $300 billion in 2015, and because states pay for part of it — about 37 percent in 2016. The federal government pays for SNAP.

The Foundation for Government Accountability says that by passing its model bill, states will save millions by canceling benefits for those who are dead, who don’t qualify, or who are committing fraud. If every state adopted the practices it advocates, the total savings could be up to $8 billion annually, the group said in a press release.

While Illinois did see savings in at least the first year of its new system, that was mostly because the state was catching up, said Anne Irving, director of public policy for AFSCME Council 31, the union that represents the state’s workers. The union estimated that having state employees do the work, rather than hiring a private contractor, would have saved the state an additional $18 million a year.

Faced with a grievance from the union related to its collective bargaining agreement, the state in 2013 reduced the amount of work it was paying the contractor to do. The contractor still flags discrepancies in the system, but it no longer makes recommendations on what the state should do about them.

In Mississippi, Equifax, the company that many states already contract with for up-to-date information, lobbied for the new law. The company wanted to educate lawmakers about the tools available in the private sector that can help them better determine eligibility, said Robert Purser of Equifax.

Under the new law, the state will now issue a request for proposals for a third-party company, and Purser said Equifax may apply. “The legislation is a step in the right direction,” he said. “It gives states the tools they need to determine eligibility.”

But it’s unclear what exactly will change under Mississippi’s new law. The law is not specific, and state officials say it’s too soon to tell how often eligibility checks will happen or whether the state will collect more information about recipients.

[Unregistered]

get him

[steveyok2tbgay]

make sure Stevey pays back the money he owes the hard working people if Rhode Island

http://www.dhs.ri.gov/Fraud/ReportFraud.php

brown pos bring me my tacobell

[Ronald McDonald]

we're hiring