Trump is going to be impeached

[Lina Goldberg]

uh, so what if he did? his presidency has been delegitimized time and again
the exgelords, boomers, zoomers are going to vote on the states where it matters and get that electoral college again

I'm voting for Biden or whatever, but I have no illusions

so you're gonna vote for the dude whose candidacy was delegitimatized by the charge of quid pro quo that failed to make it into charges in the articles of impeachment against trump lol

[Lina Goldberg]

quid pro joe

[maks]

you're going to vote for a guy who's actually on trial right now

[juji]

Yeah, being re-elected doesn't mean his impeachment will be nullified, anyone thinks gets re-election mmay be immune to impeachment but is totally wrong

so you're gonna vote for the dude whose candidacy was delegitimatized by the charge of quid pro quo that failed to make it into charges in the articles of impeachment against trump lol

oh, was it, lonnie? was that proven or a investigated by someone? can you show me their report, lol, memetard interjection

i don't give a fuck about trump's impeachment, i've already said this. it's inconsequential and a distraction by the dems

Yeah, being re-elected doesn't mean his impeachment will be nullified, anyone thinks gets re-election mmay be immune to impeachment but is totally wrong

no one said that. his impeachment will continue into his next term and then will fizzle. but the senate will try to kill it before the election even begins

[Lina Goldberg]

oh, was it, lonnie? was that proven or a investigated by someone? can you show me their report, lol, memetard interjection

i don't give a fuck about trump's impeachment, i've already said this. it's inconsequential and a distraction by the dems

Joe Biden bragging about withholding aid to Ukraine. And when trump in his perfect phone call asked for an investigation into why the prosecutor was fired, suddenly trump was being accused quid pro quo by an anonymous whistleblower with second hand knowledge of the phone call.

Quid pro quo didn't make it,into the articles of,impeachment because the same,charge can be used against Joe Biden who braggs about witholding aid to,fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son. Instead trump was charge with abuse of power for launching the investigation, which durring the house inquiry a Democrat lawyers testimony admitted he was justified to investigate.

[Lina Goldberg]

The only other charge in the articles of impeachment is obstruction of Congress. Its not obstruction of Congress to ask the courts to make a ruling. This is simple partisan bullshit.

[Lina Goldberg]

no one said that. his impeachment will continue into his next term and then will fizzle. but the senate will try to kill it before the election even begins

Trump will fail to be removed and the democrats already admitted they will immediately start a second attempt at impeachment. Complete horse shit no-one should happy they are wasting Americans time and money for hyper partisan politics just so they can retain whatever corrupt pay to play schemes they have with drug mules and foreign states or whatever

[Lina Goldberg]

The only thing you're accelerating is the destruction of your own wealth and sovereignty. Notice what varg has that a majority of pagans and white nationalists don't...


CHILDREN

[Lina Goldberg]

I'm going to be voting for either Dan Behrman



or Vermin Supreme

Put the lol in lolbritarian

[Lina Goldberg]

The only thing you're accelerating is the destruction of your own wealth and sovereignty. Notice what varg has that a majority of pagans and white nationalists don't...


CHILDREN

I should specify varg hoping for a global economic collapse but most of these other half a tards are accelerating authoritarianism

[juji]

no one said that. his impeachment will continue into his next term and then will fizzle. but the senate will try to kill it before the election even begins

Citation needed

Citation needed

dictionary needed, citation doesn't mean what you think it does

Trump will fail to be removed and the democrats already admitted they will immediately start a second attempt at impeachment. Complete horse shit no-one should happy they are wasting Americans time and money for hyper partisan politics just so they can retain whatever corrupt pay to play schemes they have with drug mules and foreign states or whatever

It's been done by both parties and it's not going to stop after trump.

I celebrated s little this week when I heard a Texan judge blocked trumps use of military funds to build the wall

here's some Lonnie approved news media coverage
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fed...l-construction

[Lina Goldberg]

Great job changing the subject from biden's corruption and you're willingness to vote for him

Joe Biden bragging about withholding aid to Ukraine. And when trump in his perfect phone call asked for an investigation into why the prosecutor was fired, suddenly trump was being accused quid pro quo by an anonymous whistleblower with second hand knowledge of the phone call.

Quid pro quo didn't make it,into the articles of,impeachment because the same,charge can be used against Joe Biden who braggs about witholding aid to,fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son. Instead trump was charge with abuse of power for launching the investigation, which durring the house inquiry a Democrat lawyers testimony admitted he was justified to investigate.

i've seen this several times, he was putting pressure on ukraine, in the open, to do something that was policy. if you think that's anywhere near trump talking trying to have an investigation opened into biden's son to cause scandal before an election you're being completely disingenuous.

[Lina Goldberg]

i've seen this several times, he was putting pressure on ukraine, in the open, to do something that was policy. if you think that's anywhere near trump talking trying to have an investigation opened into biden's son to cause scandal before an election you're being completely disingenuous.

explain the policy... why exactly was the obama admin leveraging aid to Ukraine in order to get the prosecutor fired who was investigating burisma?

[Wendy <3]

I think i ran across some vintage 70's porn videos on some dirty site last night that feature lily but i'm not sure if it's her or not because it's so grainy

[Lexi Persimmons]

i pierced my ears last night. i'm a sexy ready bitch for you.

explain the policy... why exactly was the obama admin leveraging aid to Ukraine in order to get the prosecutor fired who was investigating burisma?

here you go, loonie, what you're trying to posit, without proof, simply isn't true

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...or/3785620002/

sorry it's not from nnnnnnnnn, taking something out if context

i pierced my ears last night. i'm a sexy ready bitch for you.

Lexi get on cam

[juji]

dictionary needed, citation doesn't mean what you think it does

ok boomer

ok boomer

lack of understanding of that idiom, i guess dictionary needed again, try again

[juji]

Imagining idiom

[Lina Goldberg]

here you go, loonie, what you're trying to posit, without proof, simply isn't true

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...or/3785620002/

sorry it's not from nnnnnnnnn, taking something out if context

"The [prosecutor general's office] document once again confirms the data I had previously published on Burisma and international corruption," Derkach said. "According to Zlochevsky's suspicion notice, Biden and partners received their $16.5 million for their services to Burisma. Biden received funds not due to the successful activity of Burisma or for brilliant business decisions or recommendations. This is the money of Ukrainian citizens. The funds were obtained by criminal means. That's what they say in the PGO [prosecutor general's office]."

Derkach said the new information came from a suspicion notice to former Ukraine ecology minister and owner of the Burisma Group, Mykola Zlochevsky.

"According to the investigation, Zlochevsky was directly involved in the withdrawal of funds by the Yanukovych "family" (the Yanukovych criminal organization, according to the notice). They laundered the funds of Yanukovych through three companies in Latvia," Derkach said.

a statement by Ukrainian MP Andriy Derkach describing evidence of corruption from former Ukraine ecology minister and owner of the Burisma Group, Mykola Zlochevsky. Burisma who was paying $50,000/month to Hunter Biden despite him not having any former experience in natural gas or the energy sector, this corruption was being investigated by the former prosecutor contrary to your articles claims he was fired for not investigating any form of corruption. This is because your article isn't factually correct, its social media astroturfed opinion written to protect the current front running democrat candidate and the whistle blower hearsay narrative that lead to the trump impeachment inquiry.

An investment firm linked to Hunter Biden received over $130 million in federal bailout loans while his father Joe Biden was vice president and routed profits through a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands, according to federal banking and corporate records reviewed by the Washington Examiner.

Joe Biden was a key advocate for the financial bailout, which was approved under the Bush administration and expanded under President Barack Obama. He delayed his Senate resignation in January 2009 to cast his final vote to increase funding for the Troubled Asset Relief Program before taking office as vice president.

Biden, Heinz, and Archer incorporated Rosemont Seneca Partners in Delaware on June 25, 2009. The “alternative investment and market advisory firm” was an offshoot of Rosemont Capital, which held a 50% stake in the new venture. Rosemont Seneca and Rosemont Capital shared the same office address in lower Manhattan and the same New York phone number, according to Securities and Exchange Commission documents. Three weeks after Rosemont Seneca was incorporated, a subsidiary of Rosemont Capital, called Rosemont TALF SPV, received $23.5 million in federal loans through the TALF program. This included $13.4 million to invest in student loans and $11.1 million to invest in subprime auto loans. Over five months, the company received a total of $130 million from the program in multiple installments for investments in subprime credit cards and residential mortgages.

“This is a great example of the suspicion of many Americans that these bailouts were used to benefit connected insiders while ordinary Americans went broke,” said Tom Anderson, director of the Government Integrity Project at the National Legal and Policy Center, an organization that was critical of TALF at the time.

further evidence that joe biden abuses his position of power in order to financially benefit his son hunter's business dealings, this time with US tax dollars in tax havens instead of ukrainian tax dollars. did you rep me "no" and then post an easily refuted article or was that someone else, if it was you maybe this same short shortsightedness is the reason you would vote for an objectively corrupt politician lol

yet that nnn video you posted and neither of your other posts to me prove any of what you claim. They, in fact, use words like suspicion when talking about biden and son and clearly state this policy of quid had the endgame being regime change to a democrscy friendly govt in Ukraine as the pro, begining under a republican administration.
I changed the subject because I thought we were done with one topic, but I guess this is a much more serious, intense discussion with certain posting rules of order. Sorry, loonie

I didn't rep you. I almost always rep with, "greens -rootbeer" or don't write anything at all. I should actually give you rep for what I told you via pms, thx

a statement by Ukrainian MP Andriy Derkach describing evidence of corruption from former Ukraine ecology minister and owner of the Burisma Group, Mykola Zlochevsky. Burisma who was paying $50,000/month to Hunter Biden despite him not having any former experience in natural gas or the energy sector, this corruption was being investigated by the former prosecutor contrary to your articles claims he was fired for not investigating any form of corruption. This is because your article isn't factually correct, its social media astroturfed opinion written to protect the current front running democrat candidate and the whistle blower hearsay narrative that lead to the trump impeachment inquiry.





further evidence that joe biden abuses his position of power in order to financially benefit his son hunter's business dealings, this time with US tax dollars in tax havens instead of ukrainian tax dollars. did you rep me "no" and then post an easily refuted article or was that someone else, if it was you maybe this same short shortsightedness is the reason you would vote for an objectively corrupt politician lol

ya, at the end, I'd rather vote for corrupt Biden over corrupt Trump. hey, if there's a different corrupt politician to vote for, who has a chance of getting in, i may vote for them

Imagining idiom

REAL method taken

[Lina Goldberg]

yet that nnn video you posted and neither of your other posts to me prove any of what you claim. They, in fact, use words like suspicion when talking about biden and son and clearly state this policy of quid had the endgame being regime change to a democrscy friendly govt in Ukraine as the pro, begining under a republican administration.
I changed the subject because I thought we were done with one topic, but I guess this is a much more serious, intense discussion with certain posting rules of order. Sorry, loonie

I didn't rep you. I almost always rep with, "greens -rootbeer" or don't write anything at all. I should actually give you rep for what I told you via pms, thx

i didn't know what NNN is until just now, i thought you were making some pun about how i'm apart of the fox news audience (just to be clear i've stated many times i'm not). I just searched for the most concise video featuring the biden quote. Also i don't know what posting rules of order are.

Of course neither of us have "proof", we're debating whether or not there is evidence enough to justify investigation into abruptly ended investigations and an impeachment inquiry into whether or not trump was abusing his power when suggesting Ukraine should be investigating the son of his political rival. The fact that Joe Biden is a candidate does not exonerating him from criminal allegations, in fact his candidacy legitimizes the urgency of the investigation because of his potential to be in a seat of power.

The articles i've used display enough evidence to justify further investigation and as i just stated the fact that biden is trumps rival is superseded by the evidence of biden's corruption. Therefore not only does this

delegitimize

(not a charge btw) biden's candidacy it also undermines the abuse of power charge in the trump articles of impeachment as well as the entire narrative which led up to the impeachment inquiry.

ya, at the end, I'd rather vote for corrupt Biden over corrupt Trump. hey, if there's a different corrupt politician to vote for, who has a chance of getting in, i may vote for them

no one has posted evidence of "trump's corruption" that i haven't been able to deconstruct. For the most part everyone here has complained about his policy but haven't provided a substantial corruption narrative as made evident by the fact that the 3 years of democrats planning impeachment has resulted in a poorly constructed nothing burger. I could go on to refute claims in an attempt to save both of us time but that would be selling past the close.