When you start reading this sentence, abandon all hope of ever reading it all the way to the end, because it is about, among other things, storytelling and people who want to forbid the narrator from doing just that, but the intelligent reader knows that it can't be done, because storytelling is the most important thing, because without storytelling the most important part of it is lost, because the reader doesn't get this information from the narrator and so loses interest, because storytelling without the narrator's comments, in other words yours truly, would not be what it is, when he comments on the events and since the reader is surely already quite annoyed at this point, because he has read this, really damn long and also meaningless sentence up to this point and has not yet understood anything and has also already forgotten what this sentence started with in the first place, he now learns that the too frequent use of the word "that", which is clearly the case in this sentence, does not direct the interest of the reader, which is you by the way, to the essential, but to the unimportant side events, which leads them to understand that they have not understood the whole sentence so far, which does not necessarily mean that you, the readers, are stupid, although I would like to point out that the fact that I have said, or rather written, because you can't call it speaking when you draw characters on a sheet with a pencil, does not necessarily mean that you are stupid, that this is actually the case, but now I would like to take the opportunity, which is offered by the development of the situation, to state that, contrary to any objection, this sentence has actually begun somewhere at some time, which does not mean, however, that it is already finished now, since this is a so-called "long sentence", which means in the plain text that it has actually just begun, although, if I, the artificial intelligence, also called narrator, think about it, he probably hasn't yet, because that would mean that you know, after all this time, what this sentence was about, or at least that it was about something, be it meaningful or not, which would be illogical, a "long sentence" works according to three golden rules, which I, the artificial intelligence, called narrator by the general public, what I, the narrator, who calls himself artificial intelligence, want to tell you now briefly, whereby one should absolutely pay attention to begin with, that one, that is I, the artificial intelligence, called narrator by some, which exists only in your thoughts, not in reality, really only in your thoughts, says, that the "long sentence" must not have any sense, one continues to tell with it, that it must be used exclusively to amuse other people and/or to drive them crazy, which, don't worry, I'll spare myself the "the artificial intelligence, which some also call narrator, who sees himself as artificial intelligence" number at this point and get straight to the point, which, as you can see, seems to succeed really well, when I look at the facial expression you have on now, because only someone who is really close to losing his patience and at the same time his mental integrity, can look so shit out of the laundry, that I, the artificial intelligence, which is called narrator in the real, thus the not non-existent, world, of which everyone knows, that he considers himself as artificial intelligence, which exists only in the thoughts of the readers, which is however strongly denied by those, which call him narrator, although he is nevertheless really clearly an artificial intelligence, which everyone, which possesses a brain, which, as everyone knows, is not with everyone the case, since a not really, thus only in thoughts existing being, would hardly be able to do what it does despite this fact, namely write more or less meaningful, if not even to be called senseless sentences, by it or he, the narrator, the self-proclaimed artificial intelligence, just like that, without any particular reason, even without sense, who would have thought it, letters, which an average, of reading and writing powerful Homo Sapiens Sapiens, of the inferior, which this planet, on which we, mankind, that is all humans, which by the way is the meaning of Homo Sapiens Sapiens, who live on a ball called earth, consisting of atoms, although there are also millions of them, if not billions or even much more of them, what is then called a planet, by just those, mostly inferior beings mind you, who presume the right to call themselves human and even the crowning of creation, which from my point of view, although one...