Shutup you fucking queer
Results 31 to 46 of 46
-
09-11-2015
-
-
-
-
-
-
09-11-2015
Let the record show when i minimize the internet on my phone, it wll still say im viewing the thread
-
09-11-2015
The Concepts Behind Quantizing General Relativity
In converting General Relativity to the modern paradigm of subatomic physics, the primary obstacle faced is translating the classical elements of the Einstein field equations so they cohere mathematically with particle physics.
One of these classical elements which sticks out at first glance is the Newtonian Gravitational Constant, which is unsuitable for a describing gravity at subatomic scales. We must instead first identify the origin of gravitational momentum at the subatomic scale, which will give us a basis for formulating the replacement of the gravitational constant with units that can be worked with in quantum physics.
As it is, the Newtonian Gravitational Constant in the Einstein Field Equations does not provide an explanation for where the gravitational force comes from, but simply how it behaves.
For a proposed 'source' of gravitational momentum, nothing would fit that role better than the phenomenon of Zitterbewegung – the sporadic movement of particles in nearly every direction would follow the geodesics of curved space-time described by the tensors in the equations.
After that, only the tensors themselves still need to be put in a quantum perspective by describing a quantum equivalent of a warped geometrical space-time grid; this would require expressing space-time as having physical constituents rather than being an invisible imaginary grid lacking geometrical flaws. The simplest way is to consider 'space-time' as not being independent of its contents, and the sum of matter and energy is what makes up space-time.
Using that as the basis for a quantum equivalent of 'space-time', while also viewing Zitterbewegung as the source of gravitational momentum, we can easily visualize how gravitational acceleration increases with mass, as mass contributes to the zitterbewegung of nearby particles (since, in theory, zitterbewegung of a particle results from fluctuating positive and negative fields around the particle, causing a particle to experience more Zitterbewegung the more particles there are nearby contributing to the fluctuation).
By basing equations on Zitterbewegung instead of a meters-per-second constant, the energy involved gravitational is quantized, allowing for more accurate calculations when concerning objects with intricate structures where it is preferable to consider a number of particles and energy levels instead of units of mass (which lose precision at the subatomic scale when making calculations).
Furthermore, by quantizing the 'space-time' grid itself, fluctuations/anomalies and 'noise' in the grid's consistency can be predicted, which although lacks an apparent application in the present, it is still a more accurate depiction of reality nonetheless.
One application abandoning meters per second constant has on a macroscopic scale is that there wouldn't be the problem of inconsistencies in the length of a meter or the duration of a second depending on where you are in the universe due to changing gravity wells.
These concepts for quantizing Einsteinian gravity would not give a neat new convenient equation for gravity, and could only be maintained mathematically on a computer using complex graphing algorithms.I am the owner of http://www.ezmangaforum.com
-
09-11-2015
push gravity bullshit
I am the owner of http://www.ezmangaforum.com
-
-
urkles girlfriendking steveyos09-11-2015
next pluggy is gonna tell us he was joking about liking cock, just like dirty harry. ^_^
-
-
-
-
09-12-2015
harry.. potter?
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)