Thread: black friday
Results 61 to 90 of 153
Hybrid View
-
-
11-22-2012
australia isn't even a free country
it's full of aggressive, invasive, venomous fauna
australia can't even control rabbits and toads, no wonder you all live in fear of spiders
everything is backwards even the seasons are the wrong fucking time of year
australia has virtually no clout in global policy
oh and you live in australia, i would be embarrassed to hell to call you my countryman
-
-
-
11-22-2012
we should've let imperial japan have australia in ww2
-
-
11-22-2012
not because you want to be, because you owe your continued existence to us
-
LISAAAAAAAAAAH!king steveyos11-22-2012
Nope, try England
america also owes its existence to England
funny that
-
11-22-2012
negative
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_war
we have nobody to credit for our existence except ourselves
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_war_2
the rest of the free world including britain, however, owes their continued existence to usLast edited by blumpkin blownuts; 11-22-2012 at 10:55 PM.
-
LISAAAAAAAAAAH!king steveyos11-22-2012
No dipshit
America was once a penal colony of England, just like Australia
-
11-22-2012
a penal colony? link please
-
11-22-2012
america was never a penal colony you retard
-
11-22-2012
this is embarrassing i feel like i'm being tardtrolled into oblivion
well as long as lisa has to type alot more than me then i can claim it's backfiring
-
LISAAAAAAAAAAH!king steveyos11-22-2012
wow
it never ceases to amaze me how ignorant americans are, even about their own country
Historically penal colonies have often been used for penal labour in an economically underdeveloped part of a state's (usually colonial) territories, and on a far larger scale than a prison farm. In practice such penal colonies may be little more than slave communities. The British, French, and other colonial empires heavily used North America and other parts of the world as penal colonies to varying degrees, sometimes under the guise of indentured servitude or similar arrangements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal_colony
The British used North America as a penal colony through a system of indentured servitude. Convicts would be transported by merchants and auctioned off to plantation owners upon arrival in the colonies. It is estimated that some 50,000 British convicts were sent to colonial America, representing perhaps one-quarter of all British emigrants during the 18th century.[1] The British also would often ship Irish and Scots to the Americas whenever there were rebellions in Ireland or Scotland, and they would be treated similar to the convicts, except that this also included women and children.
-
LISAAAAAAAAAAH!king steveyos
-
11-23-2012
the embarrassment is YOU
again, nice try
-
LISAAAAAAAAAAH!king steveyos11-23-2012
Exactly as I said, America was a penal colony. Fact. It's not really open for debate you drooling tard.
You said it wasn't, you were wrong.... just embarassing yourself everywhere today aren't you? You need to try and troll someone who is actually dumber than you, that is why you are failing... and that is also why I am so good at trolling everyone :P
-
LISAAAAAAAAAAH!king steveyos
-
11-23-2012
You can't out-debate me lisa, I'm simply too versatile for you in any application of logic.
You couldn't best me in any academic area, and you can't best me with this babyshit of cherrypicking wikipedia.Last edited by blumpkin blownuts; 11-23-2012 at 12:41 AM.
-
11-23-2012
you can keep repeating that but that doesn't make it any more correct
I honestly thought you might be secretly intelligent & just hiding it from us as a troll.
Now I'm convinced you are devoid of any kind of intelligence.
-
11-23-2012
And what happened to your nose?
-
11-23-2012
If you are trying to piss me off by ignoring fundamental logic, it's working. Hope it's worth looking like a moron.
-
LISAAAAAAAAAAH!king steveyos
-
11-23-2012
your snippet says "perhaps one-quarter of british emigrants" were convicts (mostly indentured servants - the article is poorly written - probably by you)
we're also a quarter catholic but we are not a catholic country
we're also a quarter blonde, but we are not a blonde country
do you fucking understand yet?Last edited by blumpkin blownuts; 11-23-2012 at 12:51 AM.
-
11-23-2012
so the 3/4 of colonials there due to mercantile pursuits and religious persecution don't even count?
nice try, but no.
-
-
11-23-2012
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonia..._United_States
eat my smegma you retarded hoe bagGoals of colonization
Colonizers came from European kingdoms with highly developed military, naval, governmental and entrepreneurial capabilities. The Spanish and Portuguese centuries-old experience of conquest and colonization during the Reconquista, coupled with new oceanic ship navigation skills, provided the tools, ability, and desire to colonize the New World. England, France and the Netherlands started colonies in both the West Indies and North America. They had the ability to build ocean-worthy ships, but did not have as strong a history of colonization in foreign lands as did Portugal and Spain. However, English entrepreneurs gave their colonies a base of merchant-based investment that needed much less government support.[3]
Mercantilism
Mercantilism was the basic policy imposed by Britain on its colonies from the 1660s. Mercantilism meant that the government and merchants based in England became partners with the goal of increasing political power and private wealth, to the exclusion of other empires and even merchants based in its own colonies. The government protected its London-based merchants—and kept others out—by trade barriers, regulations, and subsidies to domestic industries in order to maximize exports from and minimize imports to the realm. The government had to fight smuggling, especially by American merchants, some of whose activities (which included direct trade with the French, Spanish, Dutch, and Portuguese) were classified as such by the Navigation Acts. The goal of mercantilism was to run trade surpluses, so that gold and silver would pour into London. The government took its share through duties and taxes, with the remainder going to merchants in Britain. The government spent much of its revenue on a superb Royal Navy, which not only protected the British colonies but threatened the colonies of the other empires, and sometimes seized them. Thus the British Navy captured New Amsterdam (New York) in 1664. The colonies were captive markets for British industry, and the goal was to enrich the mother country.[4]
Religious persecution
The prospect of religious persecution by authorities of the crown and the Church of England prompted a significant number of colonization efforts. People fleeing persecution by King Charles I were responsible for settling most of New England, and the Province of Maryland was founded in part to be a haven for Roman Catholics.
-
sex with dead peopleking steveyos11-23-2012
No Wii U again tonight. Not even gonna unlock the door for her.
-
-
11-23-2012
It was primarily a mercantile colony.
All I said about it being a penal colony or not was I asked you to find a link, in hopes you could realize on you're own that you are wrong. Should've known you'd cherrypick some lil snippet without reading the whole truth.Last edited by blumpkin blownuts; 11-23-2012 at 12:29 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)







