18 elementary school kids dead in school shooting 30 minutes from me

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maks

Because he knew it would be big news and people would remember his name forever, same as Cho. If they want to stop this sort of thing they need to stop whining about gun control and try to prevent the press from even mentioning the shooter's names, if we don't make celebrities out of these lunatics they won't kill a bunch of kids just to make their mark on history.

---

Because of revenge or something? i doubt if they are materialists as fuck that manipulate about social wouldn't allow him to make friends

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by juji

Because of revenge or something? i doubt if they are materialists as fuck that manipulate about social wouldn't allow him to make friends

---

They want to die but they can't handle that nobody is going to give a fuck so they make a big scene trying to shock the nation and get into the history books. it worked, the fucking president held a press conference today because some some asswipe with a gun and a grudge against his parents. the solution is to deprive these guys of what they're after, don't mention their names on the news and they'll be forgotten.

"Beautiful little kids between the ages of 5 and 10 years old," - obama

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maks

They want to die but they can't handle that nobody is going to give a fuck so they make a big scene trying to shock the nation and get into the history books. it worked, the fucking president held a press conference today because some some asswipe with a gun and a grudge against his parents. the solution is to deprive these guys of what they're after, don't mention their names on the news and they'll be forgotten.

---

If he is making with friends or having sex with a hot girl, there no reason about school shooting event happens.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jackDpedo

I don't know what those people at RH did to you guys to make you so pissed off

---

they're guilty of that most heinous of crimes, being awful posters

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by juji

If he is making with friends or having sex with a hot girl, there no reason about school shooting event happens.

---

yep pretty much. miserable people slowly going crazy alone and waiting to snap are going to be a big challenge in the west in the next few decades

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jackDpedo

And yet you so recklessly accuse me of being one of them. That isn't something you should ever do to even your worst enemy that isn't from that site.

---

one way or the other you're a pretty shitty gimmick alt

k well we can stop talking about this now, either comment on the dead kids or go make your own thread in the herpetarium, tia.

RH isn't very mature, these persons are very sensible

i finally had to turn off msnbc they've pissed me off trying to pin this on the NRA
i can't think of a single time in history that banning something reduced crime related to said contraband

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jon

picture yourself an adult, with children of your own, and they're away at school every weekday

your child's life is in the hands of the teachers and other staff of that school, again, every weekday

you trust them with food, even though allergies and choking hazards can kill in minutes

you trust them with recess and gym, even though skin comes off in contact with asphalt, and necks and bones can break on the playground and the football field

you even trust them with other kids, even though there are bullies and sharp objects everywhere

but you can't bring yourself to get over your stupid fucking politics and accept that your child's custodians should be armed, if they so choose, for self-defense

you would rather see your own kids dead than admit you are wrong about gun politics in america

---

not that i agree with banning guns but it's worth noting that the UK has not had any deadly school shootings since the Dunblane massacre in 1996, after which they outlawed all practical/modern handguns

pretty sure if the uk had as many gun mfgrs as us, or shared a border with mexico, that a handgun ban would be pointless except for law abiding citizens

its ba enough that theyve taken our jobs now the mexicans are trying to take our guns

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camoron

not that i agree with banning guns but it's worth noting that the UK has not had any deadly school shootings since the Dunblane massacre in 1996, after which they outlawed all practical/modern handguns

---

china has some of the toughest gun laws in the world

http://www.ibtimes.com/school-stabbi...-system-938335

mexico provides a loose banking service for crime guns

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maks

china has some of the toughest gun laws in the world

http://www.ibtimes.com/school-stabbi...-system-938335

---

yeah thats not really relevant, knives are not capable of wanton, unopposed carnage like an assault rifle or a handgun

britain also has cameras on every corner and probably other things to make my point better

http://i.imgur.com/Wn6TP.gif

britain is a broken, orwellian country
"did you hear about the MP that raped a baby? the times ran a story and was promptly shut down"
"keep calm and carry on!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camoron

yeah thats not really relevant, knives are not capable of wanton, unopposed carnage like an assault rifle or a handgun

---

tell that to those 22 kids

or these 8 kids http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanping_school_stabbings

or these 16 kids http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2...nt_9792007.htm

or these 3 kids http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10862175

or these 8 kids http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14706819

binders full of stabed kids

World of Warcraft simulation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maks

tell that to those 22 kids

or these 8 kids http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanping_school_stabbings

or these 16 kids http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2...nt_9792007.htm

or these 3 kids http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10862175

or these 8 kids http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14706819

---

these are isolated incidents, just like the school shootings

i am more concerned with the other 30,000 people that are killed by guns in the US every year than i am with the 20 or 30 that are killed in shooting sprees

and again I am not opposed to the right to bear arms, I believe people have a right to defend themselves and their property against other people as well as their government or anyone who may invade, and I think it sets a dangerous precedent that so many people would so quickly say "oh, we have armies and police forces now, gun rights are no longer relevant to modern society"

an armed populace is a liberated populace, but at the same time I think some more stringent steps need to be taken to reduce gun crime, both from a socioeconomic standpoint as well as a gun law standpoint, and I am not just necessarily talking about purchasing guns. So many guns that are used in crimes/shooting sprees are NOT registered to the people that used them, including in this particular incident (they were his mom's guns). With all the advances we've had in security, including biometrics, perhaps we could require gun owners to keep their guns stored in a safe or locker that is protected by a fingerprint scanner or something else? Maybe the mother already kept her guns locked up, but obviously her 20 eyar old son knew where to find the key.

I believe assault weapons especialyl should be subject to harsher restrictions. If not banned outright, perhaps they can be required to be kept at an approved location, such as a shooting range. If people insist on keeping them on their property then I believe they (assault weapons) at the very least, above all other weapons, should be required to be kept locked up under an aforementioned sort of locker or safe with a very high degree of security.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camoron

these are isolated incidents, just like the school shootings

i am more concerned with the other 30,000 people that are killed by guns in the US every year than i am with the 20 or 30 that are killed in shooting sprees

and again I am not opposed to the right to bear arms, I believe people have a right to defend themselves and their property against other people as well as their government or anyone who may invade, and I think it sets a dangerous precedent that so many people would so quickly say "oh, we have armies and police forces now, gun rights are no longer relevant to modern society"

an armed populace is a liberated populace, but at the same time I think some more stringent steps need to be taken to reduce gun crime, both from a socioeconomic standpoint as well as a gun law standpoint, and I am not just necessarily talking about purchasing guns. So many guns that are used in crimes/shooting sprees are NOT registered to the people that used them, including in this particular incident (they were his mom's guns). With all the advances we've had in security, including biometrics, perhaps we could require gun owners to keep their guns stored in a safe or locker that is protected by a fingerprint scanner or something else? Maybe the mother already kept her guns locked up, but obviously her 20 eyar old son knew where to find the key.

I believe assault weapons especialyl should be subject to harsher restrictions. If not banned outright, perhaps they can be required to be kept at an approved location, such as a shooting range. If people insist on keeping them on their property then I believe they (assault weapons) at the very least, above all other weapons, should be required to be kept locked up under an aforementioned sort of locker or safe with a very high degree of security.

---

oh fucking poo. I'll keep my guns right by my side thank you.

single action army bro

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camoron

these are isolated incidents, just like the school shootings

i am more concerned with the other 30,000 people that are killed by guns in the US every year than i am with the 20 or 30 that are killed in shooting sprees

---

30,000, eh?

"A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a situation in which they thought someone "almost certainly would have been killed" if they "had not used a gun for protection." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 162,000 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard.""

I hate wall of text of whining

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by juji

I hate wall of text of whining

---

just because your english sucks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camoron

just because your english sucks

---

offended?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maks

30,000, eh?

"A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a situation in which they thought someone "almost certainly would have been killed" if they "had not used a gun for protection." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 162,000 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard.""

---

yes, that is fine (of course if those criminals breaking into their homes didnt have guns either then what would those numbers be?)

but anyways my point is that guns can be used responsibly and usually are, but around 80% of the gun crimes that are committed are done so with illegally obtained firearms or firearms that are registered to someone else. The people that are using them in crimes are usually not the people that legally purchased them.

If you want to kepe them at your side in a holster and your state permits it, fine, whatever. Statistics support that people who carry guns are more likely to be killed by a gun so I'd rather not have one, thanks, but if you want to then whatever. The point is, gun crimes are committed primarily because of illegal gun sales and irresponsible gun owners whose guns are stolen or taken by others and then used to commit crimes/murders. Keeping a gun in a holster has nothing to do with it, but when it comes to storage I definitely think there should be some regulations on how to properly and responsibly store guns so that they do not fall into the wrong hands.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by juji

offended?

---

not at all, i wasn't whining anyways I was making an argument about gun control elz

i keep a machete by the door and thats more than i need. i am a trained black belt and both my fists are registered as lethal weapons. if i were to hit you with one of them that is a felony offense, that is if you can still report the incident...

my favorite weapon is the look in your eyes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maks

Don't worry, I'm fine

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...entary/?897098

---

yeah that's a good half hour/40 minutes from me too. i'm ok, i already died during Sandy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camoron

yes, that is fine (of course if those criminals breaking into their homes didnt have guns either then what would those numbers be?)

but anyways my point is that guns can be used responsibly and usually are, but around 80% of the gun crimes that are committed are done so with illegally obtained firearms or firearms that are registered to someone else. The people that are using them in crimes are usually not the people that legally purchased them.

If you want to kepe them at your side in a holster and your state permits it, fine, whatever. Statistics support that people who carry guns are more likely to be killed by a gun so I'd rather not have one, thanks, but if you want to then whatever. The point is, gun crimes are committed primarily because of illegal gun sales and irresponsible gun owners whose guns are stolen or taken by others and then used to commit crimes/murders. Keeping a gun in a holster has nothing to do with it, but when it comes to storage I definitely think there should be some regulations on how to properly and responsibly store guns so that they do not fall into the wrong hands.

---

please stop being perfectly reasonable, I'm looking for an argument. tia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by plusle riot

yeah that's a good half hour/40 minutes from me too. i'm ok, i already died during Sandy.

---

oh really? I thought you were further into new york

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camoron

these are isolated incidents, just like the school shootings

i am more concerned with the other 30,000 people that are killed by guns in the US every year than i am with the 20 or 30 that are killed in shooting sprees

and again I am not opposed to the right to bear arms, I believe people have a right to defend themselves and their property against other people as well as their government or anyone who may invade, and I think it sets a dangerous precedent that so many people would so quickly say "oh, we have armies and police forces now, gun rights are no longer relevant to modern society"

an armed populace is a liberated populace, but at the same time I think some more stringent steps need to be taken to reduce gun crime, both from a socioeconomic standpoint as well as a gun law standpoint, and I am not just necessarily talking about purchasing guns. So many guns that are used in crimes/shooting sprees are NOT registered to the people that used them, including in this particular incident (they were his mom's guns). With all the advances we've had in security, including biometrics, perhaps we could require gun owners to keep their guns stored in a safe or locker that is protected by a fingerprint scanner or something else? Maybe the mother already kept her guns locked up, but obviously her 20 eyar old son knew where to find the key.

I believe assault weapons especialyl should be subject to harsher restrictions. If not banned outright, perhaps they can be required to be kept at an approved location, such as a shooting range. If people insist on keeping them on their property then I believe they (assault weapons) at the very least, above all other weapons, should be required to be kept locked up under an aforementioned sort of locker or safe with a very high degree of security.

---

I did not read this FaGGOt.............................................................................. I HAVE black OPs 3 to sataiate my need for blood... for now... :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...ooobbb/mis.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Garfield

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...ooobbb/mis.gif

---

gross, that's scat porn

holy shit http://www.inquisitr.com/440355/west...-for-shooting/

I've been waiting for these nutcases to come to Connecticut, I am so there