Ok I'll shut up because now I'm getting caught up in it lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Plug Drugs
Ok I'll shut up because now I'm getting caught up in it lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Plug Drugs
the half assed push gravity theory plug drugs "came up" with has been dis proven over and over again, he wants something in his life to hold on too to make himself feel better than someone , ,anyone because in reiality he's a fat cart pushing peice of shit
At the end of the thread, people didn't - they were having to dig around for answers themselves to try and keep up and they took the route of trying to make it personal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa
A few of the guys had been giving me mathematical explanations, and they were great, why can't I just sit in a forum with them all day?
ya at the end o the thread where they locked it when you could not do simple calculus to prove anything because you are an acutal cart pushing retard, and they knew you where on to a major breakthough and wanted to stop the converstion so they could publish a sci paper that finally proved push graivity
it's not cause your a fucking FAT RETAREDED DRUG ADDICT MORON WHO CAN HARDLY ADD AND SUBTRACT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY YOU NEED TO GIVE TO YOUR METH DEALER
ugh fat meth heads trying to do sceince on the interent really boils my stew
lock this thread
He didn't actually come up or talk about push gravity, he showed a picture of two circles, one being what was called as an "object" and the other smaller one as a "particle" with arrows pointing at them and tried to say the arrows represented radiation affecting the particle which I have no idea what it supposed to show or mean or have anything to do with anything but so,e other guy said "that looks like push gravity" and then just went with that, which to be fair in the context was as good a guess as any as to what he trying to talk about but actually I just looked at his first post again and I think he was trying to say that electromagnetism could work in the same way as gravity does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Autistic Spectrum
Lol @ dp
I don't think I came up with anything; what I wanted was for them to collaborate with me on something and watch it snowball, but yeah that didn't happenQuote:
Originally Posted by Autistic Spectrum
that's what his theory is lisa look that shit up it's a retards view of push gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage...n#Basic_theory
path of least resttaince man,,, you know how when you want an 8ball of glass and you are like 100 bucks short, and your like grandma's purse is all the way upstairs,, sometimes it's just easier to yell to your grand ma to bring her purse down to hte basement,,, path of least resteince bro,,,,,, METH
Yeah well I guess it is a bit similar, it's not stupid though, it's not correct but it's not stupid
But basically what he did I think was come up with a concept of how gravity works, get that a bit wrong, and then try to apply the already wrong theory about gravity to electromagnetism... Or something like that to be honest it's not entirely clear to me what he did there at all to come up with that lol
WATER IS WET BUT WHAT IF WATER WAS DRY???
time to make a scienec thread METH
Incidentally it does look like push gravityQuote:
Originally Posted by Lisa
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...c/Pushing5.png
and Farraday's "Lines of Force" look a lot like the tensors describing fluidic space in the various solutions for the GR EFE
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Bgpa7jFV1X...tic+fields.jpg
If that thread wasn't closed I wish I could go back and mention Zitterbewegung as a contributor to free fall
path of least resistance: drugs up anus
Like, I was trying to make fucking diagrams for them with microsoft fucking paint, not the good ms paint either, the shitty shittified one
you're assuming 'magical attraction' when you shouldn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Autistic Spectrum
I'm right, it's just counter-intuitive so people think immediately think it's wrong.
I don't know what else to say, I mean, I put it all out there, it all makes sense, then they told me to write up an equation with zero help
I know I'm right because I've been thinking about it for 10 fucking years and this is the only way that makes sense
Yeah but I know you weren't even talking about push gravityQuote:
Originally Posted by Plug Drugs
However there was a lot in what you said that wasn't true or accurate but it's been covered already, you need to go back to drawing board.
Can you tell me how "strong force" plays into your theory? If you are going to bundle all the forces together surely that and "weak force" should get a mention
why don't you give your own opinion on the subject DP? Take a fucking shot: gravity, give it to us, we're openQuote:
Originally Posted by Autistic Spectrum
Dp is making me laugh,,, METH
"blah blah blah, wait a minute.. fluidic space, lines of force, relativistic mass, Zitterbewegung of quarks causing them to enter free fall, holy shit, this is the same stuff plug drugs said"
Push gravity was exactly what I was talking about; I didn't know there was a name for it until they told meQuote:
Originally Posted by Lisa
But you were relating it to electromagnetism?Quote:
Originally Posted by Plug Drugs
Yeah look I don't know what you did there but it wasn't correct.
I want you to come back and give me an explanation of the 4 basic forces, gravity, electromagnetism and strong and weak force and how they are different.
I don't know 'proper' nomenclature and notation though, which is unfortunate because the ones who do know it sit around and don't do anything with it
Neither do I but if that is the case for you you shouldn't try to use it especially out of context. If you can't explain something in layman's terms then I've always said that you don't understand it yourself. I met guys at uni who would regurgitate a bunch of shit from a text book at you to try and impress you and make them look intelligent, I would always ask them what that actually means in layman's terms and not once was one of those who had did that were able to. I could always tell they were just trying it on. Somone who actually knows and grasps the concept can explain it in laymen's or very simple terms or analogies, if they can't then basically all they showed me was that there were as intelligent as a parrot.
I was entertaining the possibility that + and - do not attract: + and + repel and so do - and - , and that's it. The reason + will stay alongside - is because the region of space that makes up where the - resides is a region of space it isn't experiencing repulsion from.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa