Lisa, come look at something I wrote and posted at a physics forum

[Lisa]

Incidentally it does look like push gravity


and Farraday's "Lines of Force" look a lot like the tensors describing fluidic space in the various solutions for the GR EFE

Yeah but I know you weren't even talking about push gravity

However there was a lot in what you said that wasn't true or accurate but it's been covered already, you need to go back to drawing board.

Can you tell me how "strong force" plays into your theory? If you are going to bundle all the forces together surely that and "weak force" should get a mention

[Plug Drugs]

Yeah but I know you weren't even talking about push gravity

However there was a lot in what you said that wasn't true or accurate but it's been covered already, you need to go back to drawing board.

Can you tell me how "strong force" plays into your theory? If you are going to bundle all the forces together surely that and "weak force" should get a mention

Push gravity was exactly what I was talking about; I didn't know there was a name for it until they told me

[Lisa]

Push gravity was exactly what I was talking about; I didn't know there was a name for it until they told me

But you were relating it to electromagnetism?

Yeah look I don't know what you did there but it wasn't correct.

I want you to come back and give me an explanation of the 4 basic forces, gravity, electromagnetism and strong and weak force and how they are different.

[Plug Drugs]

But you were relating it to electromagnetism?

Yeah look I don't know what you did there but it wasn't correct.

I want you to come back and give me an explanation of the 4 basic forces, gravity, electromagnetism and strong and weak force and how they are different.

I was entertaining the possibility that + and - do not attract: + and + repel and so do - and - , and that's it. The reason + will stay alongside - is because the region of space that makes up where the - resides is a region of space it isn't experiencing repulsion from.

[Lisa]

I was entertaining the possibility that + and - do not attract: + and + repel and so do - and - , and that's it. The reason + will stay alongside - is because the region of space that makes up where the - resides is a region of space it isn't experiencing repulsion from.

Well that's not really correct. I think strong force has something to do with something here, well it does for protons , it was keeps the neutrons and protons together... As for electrons well the strong force is actually the strongest force of all 4 forces but it only travels a minuscule space and for a minis clue time that it couldn't reach or affect a electron and these are called mesons. It's all very complicated.

Last time we did photons and this time it's mesons.

[Plug Drugs]

Well that's not really correct. I think strong force has something to do with something here, well it does for protons , it was keeps the neutrons and protons together... As for electrons well the strong force is actually the strongest force of all 4 forces but it only travels a minuscule space and for a minis clue time that it couldn't reach or affect a electron and these are called mesons. It's all very complicated.

Last time we did photons and this time it's mesons.

Isn't that just another way of saying that massive separations in scale prevent electrons from knocking loose quarks?

[Lisa]

Isn't that just another way of saying that massive separations in scale prevent electrons from knocking loose quarks?

Scale does play a HUGE part in how the forces work