Results 1 to 30 of 38

Hybrid View

  1. Collapse Details
     
    #1
    blumpkin blownuts
    blumpkin blownuts is offline
    I am postulate one blumpkin blownuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    subspace
    Posts
    7,162
    12-03-2012
    what was the nature of jack's post anyway i heard it was a topless baby
    which is of course unacceptable, i've been writing congress for a decade to get pampers ads and similar smut off the tv
    Reply With Quote
     
  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    xoxo
    king steveyos
    12-03-2012
    Quote Originally Posted by blumpkin blownuts View Post
    what was the nature of jack's post anyway i heard it was a topless baby
    which is of course unacceptable, i've been writing congress for a decade to get pampers ads and similar smut off the tv
    no it was various pictures of pre-pubescent children's bums, the pictures were not in an Anne Gedes way, they were exact same pictures Flag linked to Jack posting directly in another forum

    look it was pretty upsetting and there is absolutely no way for anyone to defend Jack to me without me thinking they are also some utter piece of shit.
    Reply With Quote
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules