No just log back out, you’re spineless

[Battery Bits]

http://www.lemauricien.com/article/a...n-and-humanity

[Mr. Jack]

its a-ok that i murdered my baby, this website says so

[Battery Bits]

Read the facts

It wasn't a baby you retards

[Battery Bits]

At which point can a fetus be considered to be a child? That's a question that's been asked over and over again not only since the recent move the government has made towards the legalization of abortion but all over the world, in every country where this issue has arisen. Some people believe that life begins at conception, some people believe that it's later, but as James Randi once said "No amount of belief makes something a fact." So, what exactly are the facts?
The scientific side
The most prominent question asked is that of the consciousness of the fetus, is it aware of its existence and would aborting it be comparable to the murder of a child who's been born? Well, according to the numerous studies done, No, it's not. A fetus' brain only starts to emit electrical signals at 12 weeks, and the EGGs recorded are comparable to that of a sea slug according to the eminent neuroscience researcher Micheal Gazzaniga in his book, "The ethical brain". A fetus only develops its cerebral cortex, the part of the brain which regulates thought and consciousness at 24 weeks, well after the limit for abortions. Before 24 weeks, its brain only emits electrical signals, not brain waves which indicate thought.
The other question often asked is whether a fetus can feel pain. Till date, there has been no definite consensus but in 2010, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a scientific report, Fetal Awareness - Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice, that "Current research shows that the sensory structures are not developed or specialized enough to respond to pain in a fetus of less than 24 weeks", pg. 22. Simply put, a fetus before 24 weeks lacks the physical capacity to feel pain and that is the current generally- accepted scientific hypothesis.
In the US, when the supreme count legalized abortion in the famous Roe v. Wade case, they
stated that a woman had the right to abort until the viability of the fetus, that is until the time at which the fetus would be able to survive outside of the woman's womb, even with artificial aid, and that was placed at 24 weeks. Before this period, the fetus is wholly dependent on the woman's body. No matter how loudly people may say that the fetus does not belong to the mother, the fact is that it's in her body that it will implant itself, it's using her blood that it will nourish itself and it's her organs which it will push aside to grow, so what right do we have to force a woman to carry it inside her body again her will for so many months?
So, if scientific facts show that a fetus cannot be deemed a person before the third trimester of pregnancy, can we put the rights of the fetus over that of a woman to choose whether to allow her body to be used by the fetus?
People have the right to believe what they want but they do not have the right to impose their beliefs on others. The right to choose is the mother's, not anyone's else.

[Mr. Jack]

Ill bet I could find a hundred articles saying that negroes arent people and its ok to kill them that doesnt make it true you murderous whore

[Battery Bits]

At which point can a fetus be considered to be a child? That's a question that's been asked over and over again not only since the recent move the government has made towards the legalization of abortion but all over the world, in every country where this issue has arisen. Some people believe that life begins at conception, some people believe that it's later, but as James Randi once said "No amount of belief makes something a fact." So, what exactly are the facts?
The scientific side
The most prominent question asked is that of the consciousness of the fetus, is it aware of its existence and would aborting it be comparable to the murder of a child who's been born? Well, according to the numerous studies done, No, it's not. A fetus' brain only starts to emit electrical signals at 12 weeks, and the EGGs recorded are comparable to that of a sea slug according to the eminent neuroscience researcher Micheal Gazzaniga in his book, "The ethical brain". A fetus only develops its cerebral cortex, the part of the brain which regulates thought and consciousness at 24 weeks, well after the limit for abortions. Before 24 weeks, its brain only emits electrical signals, not brain waves which indicate thought.
The other question often asked is whether a fetus can feel pain. Till date, there has been no definite consensus but in 2010, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a scientific report, Fetal Awareness - Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice, that "Current research shows that the sensory structures are not developed or specialized enough to respond to pain in a fetus of less than 24 weeks", pg. 22. Simply put, a fetus before 24 weeks lacks the physical capacity to feel pain and that is the current generally- accepted scientific hypothesis.
In the US, when the supreme count legalized abortion in the famous Roe v. Wade case, they
stated that a woman had the right to abort until the viability of the fetus, that is until the time at which the fetus would be able to survive outside of the woman's womb, even with artificial aid, and that was placed at 24 weeks. Before this period, the fetus is wholly dependent on the woman's body. No matter how loudly people may say that the fetus does not belong to the mother, the fact is that it's in her body that it will implant itself, it's using her blood that it will nourish itself and it's her organs which it will push aside to grow, so what right do we have to force a woman to carry it inside her body again her will for so many months?
So, if scientific facts show that a fetus cannot be deemed a person before the third trimester of pregnancy, can we put the rights of the fetus over that of a woman to choose whether to allow her body to be used by the fetus?
People have the right to believe what they want but they do not have the right to impose their beliefs on others. The right to choose is the mother's, not anyone's else.

[Battery Bits]

At which point can a fetus be considered to be a child? That's a question that's been asked over and over again not only since the recent move the government has made towards the legalization of abortion but all over the world, in every country where this issue has arisen. Some people believe that life begins at conception, some people believe that it's later, but as James Randi once said "No amount of belief makes something a fact." So, what exactly are the facts?
The scientific side
The most prominent question asked is that of the consciousness of the fetus, is it aware of its existence and would aborting it be comparable to the murder of a child who's been born? Well, according to the numerous studies done, No, it's not. A fetus' brain only starts to emit electrical signals at 12 weeks, and the EGGs recorded are comparable to that of a sea slug according to the eminent neuroscience researcher Micheal Gazzaniga in his book, "The ethical brain". A fetus only develops its cerebral cortex, the part of the brain which regulates thought and consciousness at 24 weeks, well after the limit for abortions. Before 24 weeks, its brain only emits electrical signals, not brain waves which indicate thought.
The other question often asked is whether a fetus can feel pain. Till date, there has been no definite consensus but in 2010, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a scientific report, Fetal Awareness - Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice, that "Current research shows that the sensory structures are not developed or specialized enough to respond to pain in a fetus of less than 24 weeks", pg. 22. Simply put, a fetus before 24 weeks lacks the physical capacity to feel pain and that is the current generally- accepted scientific hypothesis.
In the US, when the supreme count legalized abortion in the famous Roe v. Wade case, they
stated that a woman had the right to abort until the viability of the fetus, that is until the time at which the fetus would be able to survive outside of the woman's womb, even with artificial aid, and that was placed at 24 weeks. Before this period, the fetus is wholly dependent on the woman's body. No matter how loudly people may say that the fetus does not belong to the mother, the fact is that it's in her body that it will implant itself, it's using her blood that it will nourish itself and it's her organs which it will push aside to grow, so what right do we have to force a woman to carry it inside her body again her will for so many months?
So, if scientific facts show that a fetus cannot be deemed a person before the third trimester of pregnancy, can we put the rights of the fetus over that of a woman to choose whether to allow her body to be used by the fetus?
People have the right to believe what they want but they do not have the right to impose their beliefs on others. The right to choose is the mother's, not anyone's else.

[Battery Bits]

Not even any brain signals, it cannot feel pain, it is basically a ball of cells at that stage so piss off

[Battery Bits]

Thank god evolved societies know this

[Battery Bits]

You go move to a backwards country and get your nose out of my ass

[Mr. Jack]

every living thing on the planet could be considered a ball of cells. the nazis had lots of documentation and "scientific" papers to justify slaughtering the jews, they even said they weren't human. your using the same arguments as a nazi lisa how does that sit with you?

[Battery Bits]

Learn what differentiation is

[Mr. Jack]

learn what weak justification for atrocities is

[Battery Bits]

I've never killed a person you tards

[Battery Bits]

learn what weak justification for atrocities is

I'm not a war criminal you try-hard

[Mr. Jack]

ill bet you killed donny, you got a taste for blood when you murdered your baby and wanted to feel that rush again u fucking psycho

[Autistic Spectrum]

That kid would be all sorts of fucked up if lisa kept it, and donny was a wastiod so who cares she did the right thing murdering them

[Mr. Jack]

she could have gave it up for adoption but nope she's too selfish to adjust her lifestyle slightly for a few months so she murdered it instead

[Battery Bits]

That kid would be all sorts of fucked up if lisa kept it, and donny was a wastiod so who cares she did the right thing murdering them

Donny was a beautiful person

[Mr. Jack]

lmao donny's dead

[maks]

I'm sorry, I've misjudged you. I don't think I can be friends with someone who uses mental gymnastics like this to justify killing their own baby. Maks is right about you, he's awful in his own way but you're worse. I'm just going to leave. This isn't a good place for me.

holy shit lisa, this dude was like the nicest most innocent poster I ever met and even he couldn't tolerate you

[maks]

lmao donny's dead

yeah I know isn't it great? I hope everyone lisa cares about dies.

[Battery Bits]

He’s a drop-kick

[maks]

I hear the coroner drop kicked donny's decapitated head into the trash where it belongs

[Battery Bits]

I love Donny