Lily has nigger family members

[maks]

it was struck down right?

So if I break the law and get caught, it's ok because I got caught?

MSM who literally print lies

First amendment says that's perfectly legal and the federal government can't stop them

by appointing Gorsuch? again sorry I need clarification

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...robart-n717626

'shall not accept of any present, Emolument [a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office- might not be the same as payments for services rendered (contracted)], Office, or Title, of any kind'

I could see why you would think its dubious because he still owns the business but as far as I can see the lawsuit is still pending so maybe i'll be wrong.

As soon as that one's over he's going to be facing another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.e7043327cd28

[Lina Goldberg]

So if I break the law and get caught, it's ok because I got caught?

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens: (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

he didn't break the law, past presidents did the same thing, and this is some new precedent being set

(MSM lies) First amendment says that's perfectly legal and the federal government can't stop them

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...robart-n717626

"The concern is that repeated attacks on individual judges could diminish the confidence that people have that judges are ruling on cases in accordance with the law," University of Pittsburgh Law Professor Arthur Hellman told NBC News.
"You can disagree with a judge's conclusion, but judges reach their conclusions based on the arguments from both sides," Hellman said. "To personalize it and make it seem like the judge is doing it for no good reason is troubling.

"The concern is that repeated attacks on the president could diminish the confidence that people have that the president is acting in accordance with the law. You can disagree with a president's actions, but the president has reached his conclusions based on obstruction from both sides. To personalize it and make it seem like the president is doing it for no good reason is troubling."

the propaganda machine is painfully easy to refute. it's completely one dimensional lol

As soon as that one's over he's going to be facing another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.e7043327cd28

i'm literally shaking! (if he broke the law, he broke the law, but only time will tell)

[maks]

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens: (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

he didn't break the law, past presidents did the same thing, and this is some new precedent being set

we've covered this like 40 times now, what trump's doing is different, and it's unconstitutional. the first amendment doesn't protect nationality but it sure as fuck protects religion.