why doesn't the USA invade Australia and take all its resources and enslave its people

[internutt]

japan couldn't have held australia, their ground troops were tied up in manchuria. they had a pretty effective navy and air force, a 'run and gun' attack like pearl harbor was the right move, but maybe not against a country so huge and physically insulated, with near infinite industrial capacity and powerful allies

i dont reply despite the temptation to people like elz. just... no point.

ww2 played out exactly how it "could have should have would have", the end. unless you literally use god-powers to change 1930s or 40s reality it will always end the same. i mean wtf



"but what if the nazis developed super weapons in 1944". they didnt because they couldnt. the end

[maks]

i dont reply despite the temptation to people like elz. just... no point.

ww2 played out exactly how it "could have should have would have", the end. unless you literally use god-powers to change 1930s or 40s reality it will always end the same. i mean wtf



"but what if the nazis developed super weapons in 1944". they didnt because they couldnt. the end

I don't necessarily agree, like if they'd attacked the soviets or just just kept futzing around in china and left the US alone it would have been a very different war and probably a very different world afterward. they attacked pearl harbor to pressure us in to selling them oil. if they'd hit russia instead, they may have capitulated, or they may have conquered japan. I don't think the US would have gotten involved in the pacific at all.

[internutt]

it also pisses me off in korea the way they NEVER ever let up that hey were "victims of japan". if japan had maintained hegemony perhaps by not attacking pearl harbour korea post-war would be so proud to be "almost japanese". also koreans were a major cause of brutality in japanese pow camps.

[maks]

it also pisses me off in korea the way they NEVER ever let up that hey were "victims of japan". if japan had maintained hegemony perhaps by not attacking pearl harbour korea post-war would be so proud to be "almost japanese". also koreans were a major cause of brutality in japanese pow camps.

was it even as bad as nanking? they did some dark shit in manchuria.

was it even as bad as nanking? they did some dark shit in manchuria.

raped their Nanking

[internutt]

was it even as bad as nanking? they did some dark shit in manchuria.

before anythig oh boy i see m0nde posting too. here comes the hypotheticals. lol but we

my issue is that 1. korean pimps, thugs and officials are the ones who actually did so much of the stuff, yet they just blame it all on japanese. and the truth is in asia at tat time when a family has their 4th daugter out of 6 kids that kid is probably goi g to be a prostitute. 2. koreans did insane rapegang to death and destroy wntire village shit with torture and mutilation in vietnam on a huge and very unknown scale. also there were tons of illegal revege attacks on japanese fishing boats in the late 40s by korean navy.