how is it a win? a state can say something is legal under their own laws but that doesnt make it legal under federal law, and the federal government still ahs the jurisdiction to enforce federal law which is that marijuana is a schedule 1 substance and is illegal to distribute even for medicinal purpose (Gonzales v Raich, 2005) which is why the feds shut down/have threatened to shut down many medicinal marijuana dispensaries
Results 1 to 30 of 42
Hybrid View
-
11-08-2012
Last edited by Camoron; 11-08-2012 at 01:14 AM.
-
11-08-2012
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
The only reason they can ban drugs federally is because they come up with creative ways to interpret (read: destroy the spirit of) the commerce clause
-
-
11-08-2012
there is no spirit of the constitution or of any of the amendments to it. it is an intentionally vague, living document that has been challenged and interpreted differently for as long as its been in use. the founding fathers were not this idealistic group of guys that agreed on everything and they certainly never agreed on what the balance of power and autonomy between the federal government and the individual states should be.
-
11-08-2012
What a crock of shit. The constitution is a living document in that it can be amended. However, words mean stuff, you can't just reinterpret them to mean what you want them to mean. If the framers of the constitution had intended to give the federal government the power to ban drugs they would not have phrased it "Congress shall have Power to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes". "Interpretation" is just a dishonest and immoral shortcut around the amendment process.
Last edited by maks; 11-08-2012 at 01:23 AM.
-
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)