Lily has nigger family members

[Lina Goldberg]

trump has been the president for the past two centuries and hes one dimensionally responsible for all authoritarianism!

[maks]

trump has been the president for the past two centuries and hes one dimensionally responsible for all authoritarianism!

we haven't had a president with such a hard-on for authoritarianism since LBJ, and I think trump may be worse

[Lina Goldberg]

we haven't had a president with such a hard-on for authoritarianism since LBJ, and I think trump may be worse

I disagree

[juji]

I disagree

I agree with maks, Trump tought the president has access to all powers would be like a god king of the America

[Lina Goldberg]

I agree with maks, Trump tought the president has access to all powers would be like a god king of the America

Hillary thought she was gonna win the election

[maks]

I disagree

name a president who's gone to such great lengths to damage the bill of rights

[Lina Goldberg]

name a president who's gone to such great lengths to damage the bill of rights

name how Donald trump has damaged the bill of rights

[maks]

name how Donald trump has damaged the bill of rights

besides the muslim ban? he's threatened the press for reporting negative stories about him, going as far as threatening to have the FBI arrest them, advocated extrajudicial and cruel/unusual punishment, and undermined the judicial branch.

he also violated the enoulments clause but I guess that's not technically in the bill of rights but the constitution proper.

[Lina Goldberg]

besides the muslim ban?

it was struck down right?

he's threatened the press for reporting negative stories about him, going as far as threatening to have the FBI arrest them,

MSM who literally print lies

advocated extrajudicial and cruel/unusual punishment,

advocation isn't the same as actually impeding your rights. also do you mind clarifying if im missing something specific?

and undermined the judicial branch.

by appointing Gorsuch? again sorry I need clarification

he also violated the enoulments clause but I guess that's not technically in the bill of rights but the constitution proper.

'shall not accept of any present, Emolument [a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office- might not be the same as payments for services rendered (contracted)], Office, or Title, of any kind'

I could see why you would think its dubious because he still owns the business but as far as I can see the lawsuit is still pending so maybe i'll be wrong.