Results 1 to 30 of 493

Hybrid View

  1. Collapse Details
     
    #1
    DogManz maks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lud, Midworld
    Posts
    99,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Lina Goldberg View Post
    I disagree
    name a president who's gone to such great lengths to damage the bill of rights
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Senior Member Lina Goldberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,439
    Quote Originally Posted by maks View Post
    name a president who's gone to such great lengths to damage the bill of rights
    name how Donald trump has damaged the bill of rights
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #3
    DogManz maks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lud, Midworld
    Posts
    99,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Lina Goldberg View Post
    name how Donald trump has damaged the bill of rights
    besides the muslim ban? he's threatened the press for reporting negative stories about him, going as far as threatening to have the FBI arrest them, advocated extrajudicial and cruel/unusual punishment, and undermined the judicial branch.

    he also violated the enoulments clause but I guess that's not technically in the bill of rights but the constitution proper.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    Senior Member Lina Goldberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,439
    Quote Originally Posted by maks View Post
    besides the muslim ban?
    it was struck down right?

    he's threatened the press for reporting negative stories about him, going as far as threatening to have the FBI arrest them,
    MSM who literally print lies

    advocated extrajudicial and cruel/unusual punishment,
    advocation isn't the same as actually impeding your rights. also do you mind clarifying if im missing something specific?

    and undermined the judicial branch.
    by appointing Gorsuch? again sorry I need clarification

    he also violated the enoulments clause but I guess that's not technically in the bill of rights but the constitution proper.
    'shall not accept of any present, Emolument [a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office- might not be the same as payments for services rendered (contracted)], Office, or Title, of any kind'

    I could see why you would think its dubious because he still owns the business but as far as I can see the lawsuit is still pending so maybe i'll be wrong.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    DogManz maks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lud, Midworld
    Posts
    99,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Lina Goldberg View Post
    it was struck down right?
    So if I break the law and get caught, it's ok because I got caught?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lina Goldberg View Post
    MSM who literally print lies
    First amendment says that's perfectly legal and the federal government can't stop them

    Quote Originally Posted by Lina Goldberg View Post
    by appointing Gorsuch? again sorry I need clarification
    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...robart-n717626

    Quote Originally Posted by Lina Goldberg View Post
    'shall not accept of any present, Emolument [a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office- might not be the same as payments for services rendered (contracted)], Office, or Title, of any kind'

    I could see why you would think its dubious because he still owns the business but as far as I can see the lawsuit is still pending so maybe i'll be wrong.
    As soon as that one's over he's going to be facing another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.e7043327cd28
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Senior Member Lina Goldberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,439
    Quote Originally Posted by maks View Post
    So if I break the law and get caught, it's ok because I got caught?
    8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens: (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

    he didn't break the law, past presidents did the same thing, and this is some new precedent being set

    (MSM lies) First amendment says that's perfectly legal and the federal government can't stop them

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...robart-n717626

    "The concern is that repeated attacks on individual judges could diminish the confidence that people have that judges are ruling on cases in accordance with the law," University of Pittsburgh Law Professor Arthur Hellman told NBC News.
    "You can disagree with a judge's conclusion, but judges reach their conclusions based on the arguments from both sides," Hellman said. "To personalize it and make it seem like the judge is doing it for no good reason is troubling.
    "The concern is that repeated attacks on the president could diminish the confidence that people have that the president is acting in accordance with the law. You can disagree with a president's actions, but the president has reached his conclusions based on obstruction from both sides. To personalize it and make it seem like the president is doing it for no good reason is troubling."

    the propaganda machine is painfully easy to refute. it's completely one dimensional lol

    As soon as that one's over he's going to be facing another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.e7043327cd28
    i'm literally shaking! (if he broke the law, he broke the law, but only time will tell)
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    DogManz maks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lud, Midworld
    Posts
    99,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Lina Goldberg View Post
    8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens: (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

    he didn't break the law, past presidents did the same thing, and this is some new precedent being set
    we've covered this like 40 times now, what trump's doing is different, and it's unconstitutional. the first amendment doesn't protect nationality but it sure as fuck protects religion.
    Reply With Quote
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •