Thread: Lily has nigger family members
Results 1 to 30 of 493
Hybrid View
-
-
-
05-21-2018
besides the muslim ban? he's threatened the press for reporting negative stories about him, going as far as threatening to have the FBI arrest them, advocated extrajudicial and cruel/unusual punishment, and undermined the judicial branch.
he also violated the enoulments clause but I guess that's not technically in the bill of rights but the constitution proper.
-
05-21-2018
it was struck down right?
MSM who literally print lieshe's threatened the press for reporting negative stories about him, going as far as threatening to have the FBI arrest them,
advocation isn't the same as actually impeding your rights. also do you mind clarifying if im missing something specific?advocated extrajudicial and cruel/unusual punishment,
by appointing Gorsuch? again sorry I need clarificationand undermined the judicial branch.
'shall not accept of any present, Emolument [a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office- might not be the same as payments for services rendered (contracted)], Office, or Title, of any kind'he also violated the enoulments clause but I guess that's not technically in the bill of rights but the constitution proper.
I could see why you would think its dubious because he still owns the business but as far as I can see the lawsuit is still pending so maybe i'll be wrong.
-
05-21-2018
So if I break the law and get caught, it's ok because I got caught?
First amendment says that's perfectly legal and the federal government can't stop them
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...robart-n717626
As soon as that one's over he's going to be facing another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.e7043327cd28
-
05-21-2018
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens: (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
he didn't break the law, past presidents did the same thing, and this is some new precedent being set
"The concern is that repeated attacks on the president could diminish the confidence that people have that the president is acting in accordance with the law. You can disagree with a president's actions, but the president has reached his conclusions based on obstruction from both sides. To personalize it and make it seem like the president is doing it for no good reason is troubling."(MSM lies) First amendment says that's perfectly legal and the federal government can't stop them
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...robart-n717626
"The concern is that repeated attacks on individual judges could diminish the confidence that people have that judges are ruling on cases in accordance with the law," University of Pittsburgh Law Professor Arthur Hellman told NBC News.
"You can disagree with a judge's conclusion, but judges reach their conclusions based on the arguments from both sides," Hellman said. "To personalize it and make it seem like the judge is doing it for no good reason is troubling.
the propaganda machine is painfully easy to refute. it's completely one dimensional lol
i'm literally shaking! (if he broke the law, he broke the law, but only time will tell)As soon as that one's over he's going to be facing another one https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.e7043327cd28
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)







